components/shopify/actions/get-pages/get-pages.mjs (1)

24-39: Consider adding error handling in the run method.

The new async run method looks good overall, properly utilizing the updated GraphQL API through the getPaginated method. However, there's no explicit error handling for potential API failures.

Consider adding try/catch blocks to handle API errors gracefully:

  async run({ $ }) {
+   try {
      const pages = await this.shopify.getPaginated({
        resourceFn: this.shopify.listPages,
        resourceKeys: [
          "pages",
        ],
        variables: {
          reverse: this.reverse,
        },
        max: this.maxResults,
      });
      $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${pages.length} page${pages.length === 1
        ? ""
        : "s"}`);
      return pages;
+   } catch (error) {
+     $.export("$summary", `Failed to retrieve pages: ${error.message}`);
+     throw error;
+   }
  },

components/shopify/actions/create-page/create-page.mjs (1)

29-31: Consider enhancing error handling to show all user errors

The current implementation only shows the first user error if multiple are present. Consider improving the error handling to include all error messages when multiple errors are returned by the API.

-    if (response.pageCreate.userErrors.length > 0) {
-      throw new Error(response.pageCreate.userErrors[0].message);
-    }
+    if (response.pageCreate.userErrors.length > 0) {
+      const errorMessages = response.pageCreate.userErrors
+        .map(error => error.message)
+        .join("; ");
+      throw new Error(`Failed to create page: ${errorMessages}`);
+    }

components/shopify/actions/update-metaobject/update-metaobject.mjs (2)

32-43: Conditional fallback within additionalProps.
Catching errors in getMetaobjectFields and defaulting to getTypeFields is user-friendly. However, consider logging or surfacing the original error for better debugging.

---

62-75: getTypeFields consistently defaults new fields to string.
Similar to getMetaobjectFields, ensure we handle or parse different data types if needed. Otherwise, this approach works for text-based metaobject fields.

components/shopify/actions/update-page/update-page.mjs (3)

30-44: Consider conditional inclusion of optional properties

The implementation correctly calls the GraphQL API with proper error handling, but could be improved by only including optional properties when they have values.

 async run({ $ }) {

+  const page = {};
+  if (this.title !== undefined) page.title = this.title;
+  if (this.body !== undefined) page.body = this.body;
+
   const response = await this.shopify.updatePage({
     id: this.pageId,
-    page: {
-      title: this.title,
-      body: this.body,
-    },
+    page,
   });
   if (response.pageUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) {
     throw new Error(response.pageUpdate.userErrors[0].message);
   }
   $.export("$summary", `Updated page with ID ${response.pageUpdate.page.id}`);
   return response;
 },

---

39-41: Consider improving error handling to display all errors

Currently only the first error message is shown. Consider displaying all error messages to provide more comprehensive feedback.

 if (response.pageUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) {
-  throw new Error(response.pageUpdate.userErrors[0].message);
+  const errorMessages = response.pageUpdate.userErrors.map(error => error.message).join(', ');
+  throw new Error(`Failed to update page: ${errorMessages}`);
 }

---

42-43: Consider returning a more focused response object

The function currently returns the entire API response. It might be more useful to return just the updated page data.

 $.export("$summary", `Updated page with ID ${response.pageUpdate.page.id}`);
- return response;
+ return response.pageUpdate.page;

components/shopify/actions/create-custom-collection/create-custom-collection.mjs (2)

31-36: Consider validating or sanitizing the image URL
If you expect only valid URLs, you could add a lightweight client-side check or parse logic to handle malformed input (e.g., throwing a user-friendly error).

---

38-53: Improve JSON parse and user errors handling

1. If this.metafields is not valid JSON, utils.parseJson may throw. Consider wrapping parseJson in a try/catch to provide friendlier error messages.
2. Consider surfacing all user errors rather than just the first (response.collectionCreate.userErrors[0]) to assist in diagnosing multiple issues.

components/shopify/actions/delete-article/delete-article.mjs (1)

27-33: Consider adding error handling to the run method.

The new run method implements the article deletion functionality but lacks explicit error handling. Consider adding a try/catch block to handle potential API errors gracefully.

async run({ $ }) {
+  try {
    const response = await this.shopify.deleteArticle({
      id: this.articleId,
    });
    $.export("$summary", `Deleted article with ID ${this.articleId} from blog with ID ${this.blogId}`);
    return response;
+  } catch (error) {
+    $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete article: ${error.message}`);
+    throw error;
+  }
},

components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (1)

73-120: Query building and filtering logic looks robust.

1. Building the query with conditional checks for title, productIds, collectionId, productType, and vendor improves search customization.
2. The exact match vs. partial match approach is thoughtfully separated:
   • Exact match applies a fully quoted title: in the query string.
   • Partial match filters client-side with JavaScript’s includes() method.
3. Ensuring no more than maxResults items are returned is a good performance safeguard.
4. Exporting a summary string is user-friendly, informing about the search outcome.

Consider verifying if fields with potential spaces (e.g., productType, vendor) also require quotes in the GraphQL query for consistent matching, similar to how you handle exact matches for title. This can help avoid unexpected results or errors. Otherwise, the logic is clear and effective.

components/shopify/actions/delete-page/delete-page.mjs (1)

18-24: New run method implementation looks good but consider adding error handling.

The new implementation correctly uses the GraphQL API through the shopify module. However, there's no explicit error handling in case the API call fails.

Consider adding a try/catch block to handle potential API errors:

async run({ $ }) {
+  try {
    const response = await this.shopify.deletePage({
      id: this.pageId,
    });
    $.export("$summary", `Deleted page with ID ${this.pageId}`);
    return response;
+  } catch (error) {
+    $.export("$summary", `Failed to delete page: ${error.message}`);
+    throw error;
+  }
},

components/shopify/actions/create-metaobject/create-metaobject.mjs (4)

2-3: Use a more descriptive alias for 'common' if desired.
The generic alias common might make it harder to differentiate from other imports as the codebase grows. Consider renaming it to something more explicit (e.g. metaobjectCommon), though this is purely optional.

---

48-56: Validate field types if your metaobject definitions contain non-string fields.
Currently, all fields are treated as strings. If certain field definitions require numeric or date values, consider additional type checks or transformations.

---

63-65: Consider aggregating multiple user errors.
Currently, only the first user error is thrown. If multiple errors exist, logging or throwing them all might improve debugging.

---

67-72: Provide a fallback summary if no ID is returned.
If the creation fails silently (e.g., no ID but no user errors), you might want a fallback summary message or a warning to signal partial success or unexpected conditions.

components/shopify/actions/update-product/update-product.mjs (3)

92-112: The run method handles async product updates well.
Consider throwing or collecting multiple user errors, if necessary. Otherwise, the approach of raising the first error is acceptable.

---

113-117: Use optional chaining for cleaner handling of this.images.

-    media: this.images && this.images.map((image) => ({
+    media: this.images?.map((image) => ({

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 113-116: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

---

118-120: Consider surfacing all user errors for better troubleshooting.
Currently, only the first error message is thrown. You could join multiple errors if needed.

- if (response.productUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) {
-   throw new Error(response.productUpdate.userErrors[0].message);
- }
+ if (response.productUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) {
+   const messages = response.productUpdate.userErrors.map((e) => e.message).join("; ");
+   throw new Error(messages);
+ }

components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (3)

109-132: Mutation name mismatch in query comment

There's a discrepancy between the variable name CREATE_COLLECTION and the GraphQL operation name in the comment createCollectionMetafields. This could cause confusion during implementation.

-  mutation createCollectionMetafields($input: CollectionInput!) {
+  mutation collectionCreate($input: CollectionInput!) {

---

176-192: Identical mutations for CREATE_METAFIELD and UPDATE_METAFIELD

Both CREATE_METAFIELD and UPDATE_METAFIELD use the same metafieldsSet GraphQL operation. While this is valid if Shopify's API uses the same mutation for both operations, adding a comment explaining this behavior would improve clarity.

Consider adding a comment to one of these constants explaining that Shopify's GraphQL API uses the same operation for both creating and updating metafields:

const CREATE_METAFIELD = `
  mutation MetafieldsSet($metafields: [MetafieldsSetInput!]!) {
      metafieldsSet(metafields: $metafields) {
        metafields {
          key
          namespace
          value
          createdAt
          updatedAt
        }
        userErrors {
          field
          message
        }
      }
    }
`;

+// Note: UPDATE_METAFIELD uses the same GraphQL operation as CREATE_METAFIELD
+// because Shopify's API uses metafieldsSet for both creating and updating metafields
const UPDATE_METAFIELD = `
  mutation MetafieldsSet($metafields: [MetafieldsSetInput!]!) {
    metafieldsSet(metafields: $metafields) {
      metafields {
        key
        namespace
        value
        createdAt
        updatedAt
      }
      userErrors {
        field
        message
      }
    }
  }
`;

Also applies to: 229-245

---

1-445: Consider adding JSDoc comments for improved documentation

While the GraphQL mutations are well-structured, adding JSDoc comments for each mutation would improve maintainability and make the file more developer-friendly, especially for those who may not be familiar with all aspects of the Shopify GraphQL API.

Example implementation:

+/**
+ * Creates a webhook subscription in Shopify
+ * @param {string} topic - The webhook topic to subscribe to
+ * @param {Object} webhookSubscription - The webhook subscription details
+ * @returns {Object} The created webhook and any user errors
+ */
const CREATE_WEBHOOK = `
  mutation webhookSubscriptionCreate(
    $topic: WebhookSubscriptionTopic!,
    $webhookSubscription: WebhookSubscriptionInput!
  ) {
    // ... existing code
  }`;

components/shopify/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1)

42-46: Added null check for safer webhook deletion.

The addition of a check to verify that webhookId exists before attempting to delete it is a good defensive programming practice. This prevents potential errors if deactivation is called before a webhook ID has been set or if webhook creation failed.

Consider adding a log message when webhookId doesn't exist to help with debugging:

if (webhookId) {
  await this.app.deleteWebhook(webhookId);
+} else {
+  console.log("No webhook ID found during deactivation");
}

components/shopify/actions/update-inventory-level/update-inventory-level.mjs (2)

7-7: Fix the minor spelling error in the URL description.

Please update "documenation" to "documentation" to maintain professionalism and clarity.

-  description: "Sets the inventory level for an inventory item at a location. [See the documenation](https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/latest/mutations/inventorySetOnHandQuantities)"
+  description: "Sets the inventory level for an inventory item at a location. [See the documentation](https://shopify.dev/docs/api/admin-graphql/latest/mutations/inventorySetOnHandQuantities)"

---

38-43: Set a default for the inventory adjustment reason if none is provided.

If this prop is required, ensure the user must select a reason. Alternatively, provide a sensible default to avoid potential upstream errors.

components/shopify/common/queries.mjs (3)

29-65: Consider paginating article metafields separately.

The query is well-structured, but using the same $first parameter for both articles and their metafields might lead to unexpected behavior, as it limits both the number of articles and the number of metafields per article.

Consider using a separate parameter for metafields pagination:

-  query BlogShow($id: ID!, $first: Int, $after: String, $reverse: Boolean) {
+  query BlogShow($id: ID!, $first: Int, $after: String, $reverse: Boolean, $metafieldsFirst: Int) {
     blog(id: $id) {
       articles(first: $first, after: $after, reverse: $reverse) {
         // ...
-        metafields (first: $first) {
+        metafields (first: $metafieldsFirst) {
           // ...
         }
       }
     }
   }

---

67-88: Same pagination parameter issue for blogs metafields.

Similar to the previous query, using the same $first parameter for both blogs and metafields pagination.

Consider using a separate parameter for metafields pagination:

-  query BlogList($first: Int, $after: String) {
+  query BlogList($first: Int, $after: String, $metafieldsFirst: Int) {
     blogs(first: $first, after: $after) {
       // ...
-      metafields (first: $first) {
+      metafields (first: $metafieldsFirst) {
         // ...
       }
     }
   }

---

213-237: Apply separate pagination to productVariants and their metafields.

Similar pagination parameter reuse issue as in previous queries.

Use a dedicated parameter for metafields pagination:

-  query ($first: Int, $after: String, $query: String) {
+  query ($first: Int, $after: String, $query: String, $metafieldsFirst: Int) {
     productVariants (first: $first, after: $after, query: $query) {
       // ...
-      metafields (first: $first) {
+      metafields (first: $metafieldsFirst) {
         // ...
       }
     }
   }

components/shopify/actions/add-product-to-custom-collection/add-product-to-custom-collection.mjs (3)

27-37: Add handling for empty productIds array.

The run method doesn't check if the productIds array is empty before making the API call, which could lead to unnecessary API requests.

Add a check for empty productIds:

 async run({ $ }) {
+  if (!this.productIds.length) {
+    $.export("$summary", "No products provided to add to the collection");
+    return { skipped: true };
+  }
   const response = await this.shopify.addProductsToCollection({
     id: this.collectionId,
     productIds: this.productIds,
   });
   if (response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors.length > 0) {
     throw new Error(response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors[0].message);
   }
   $.export("$summary", `Added product(s) \`${this.productIds}\` to collection \`${this.collectionId}\``);
   return response;
 },

---

32-34: Improve error handling to include all error messages.

The current implementation only reports the first error message when multiple errors might be present, which could hide additional important information.

Consider returning all error messages:

 if (response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors.length > 0) {
-  throw new Error(response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors[0].message);
+  const errorMessages = response.collectionAddProductsV2.userErrors
+    .map(error => error.message)
+    .join(", ");
+  throw new Error(`Failed to add products to collection: ${errorMessages}`);
 }

---

35-35: Improve summary message for better clarity.

The current summary message uses template literals with backticks for variables, which isn't very readable when displaying array values.

Enhance the summary message for better readability:

-$.export("$summary", `Added product(s) \`${this.productIds}\` to collection \`${this.collectionId}\``);
+$.export("$summary", `Added ${this.productIds.length} product(s) to collection ${this.collectionId}`);

components/shopify/sources/new-article/new-article.mjs (1)

34-40: Ensure robust metadata generation.

The generateMeta method assumes that the article object always has valid properties but doesn't handle cases where properties might be missing.

Add null checks and fallbacks for metadata generation:

 generateMeta(article) {
   return {
     id: article.id,
-    summary: `New Article: ${article.title}`,
+    summary: `New Article: ${article.title || "Untitled"}`,
     ts: Date.parse(article[this.getTsField()]),
   };
 },

components/shopify/actions/delete-metafield/delete-metafield.mjs (2)

10-19: Consider documenting the dynamic properties.

The new additionalProps() logic is clear, but it might be helpful to add brief comments explaining how each dynamically generated property is determined (e.g., ownerId usage, reload, etc.) to aid maintainability and future updates.

---

20-35: Fix the label to reflect a delete operation.

Line 24’s description says "The metafield to update," but this file is for deleting a metafield. Consider changing that text to avoid confusion.

- description: "The metafield to update"
+ description: "The metafield to delete"

components/shopify/actions/update-metafield/update-metafield.mjs (3)

7-8: Add or fix the documentation link.

The description references documentation with empty parentheses. Please provide the correct Shopify docs URL to prevent confusion for users looking to reference the official guide.

---

10-19: Docstring for dynamic properties suggested.

Similar to the delete-metafield file, adding docstrings explaining the logic behind additionalProps()—particularly how ownerId is used and reloaded—can be beneficial for long-term maintainability.

---

38-46: Ensure consistency in property naming and descriptions.

The logic to display a value property only if this.metafieldId is present is a clean approach. Adding a short comment clarifying this conditional property can prevent confusion for future maintainers.

components/shopify/common/utils.mjs (2)

1-2: Validate gid prior to splitting.

getIdFromGid() assumes gid is a string containing /. For defensive programming, consider checking the type of gid and whether it contains /, returning a more descriptive error or fallback if conditions aren’t met.

---

5-33: Confirm any JSON parsing edge cases.

parseJson() gracefully handles arrays of JSON strings, single strings, and other inputs. Ensure large or malformed JSON inputs are accounted for, and consider adding logs or user feedback when parsing fails.

components/shopify/actions/search-custom-collection-by-name/search-custom-collection-by-name.mjs (1)

45-72: Efficient custom collection search logic.
The run method’s approach to pagination, filtering, and limiting results is effective. Truncating with collections.length = this.maxResults works, but ensure calling code is aware of the possibility of partial results.

components/shopify/sources/new-product-created/new-product-created.mjs (1)

15-15: Hard-coded event topic.
Using a literal "PRODUCTS_CREATE" is fine if constants are deprecated, but referencing a global constant may reduce duplication if you rely on the same topic in multiple places.

components/shopify/actions/update-article/update-article.mjs (1)

33-37: HTML body property.
Exposing an optional bodyHtml helps with partial article updates, but consider clarifying usage constraints (e.g., large HTML content).

components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs (4)

2-3: Streamline or remove imports if unnecessary
If these imports from utils.mjs and constants.mjs aren't used extensively, consider removing or consolidating them to keep imports lean.

---

32-36: Optional Title usage
Although specifying a Title is optional, consider validating the string length or contents (e.g., no leading/trailing whitespace) to ensure data hygiene.

---

55-74: Dynamic property injection
Modifying existingProps.optionIds.hidden and returning additional props conditionally is clever. However, mutating existingProps can occasionally introduce side effects. Consider cloning it to maintain a more functional approach.

---

76-92: Potential performance note in getOptionValues
This approach effectively builds a mapping for option values. If product variants scale significantly, caching or partial fetches might be beneficial to reduce repeated lookups.

components/shopify/actions/create-article/create-article.mjs (2)

18-21: Title is mandatory
Setting a required title is expected for an article. Make sure to handle scenarios where a blank title is inadvertently provided.

---

53-74: Error handling for multiple userErrors
Currently, you only throw the first user error (response.articleCreate.userErrors[0]). For broader transparency, consider aggregating all error messages or clarifying them for the user.

components/shopify/actions/add-tags/add-tags.mjs (3)

24-35: Resource ID (gid) & tag props
Both are now well-defined. Consider ensuring the user fully understands how to retrieve gid from Shopify Admin to prevent confusion.

---

36-60: Conditional property injection
Fetching product data only when resource === "Product" is elegant. You may want to log or surface more user-friendly messages if the resource detail fetch fails.

---

61-70: User error aggregation
Similar to other actions, only the first user error is thrown. Aggregating all errors might improve the debugging experience.

components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs (3)

8-9: Consider referencing a stable version of the Shopify docs.
If there’s a stable equivalent of the metafieldsSet documentation, it might offer more consistent and reliable guidance than the unstable link.

---

31-43: Allow different data types in “value.”
Currently, value is hardcoded to a string type. If there’s a plan to store numbers, JSON, or other types in the metafield, consider making this field’s type more flexible.

---

44-58: Collect all user errors.
Right now, you throw only the first user error that appears. If multiple errors occur, consider concatenating them or returning all of them so the user has full context.

components/shopify/actions/create-smart-collection/create-smart-collection.mjs (2)

35-57: Consider a max limit on rules.
Dynamically generating properties is neat. However, a large value of “rules” could clutter the UI or degrade performance.

---

58-82: Display all user error messages.
You’re throwing only the first error returned in response.collectionCreate.userErrors. Issuing all error messages might be more helpful.

components/shopify/actions/common/metaobjects.mjs (1)

27-35: Updating metaobjects consistently.
Matches the create flow well. If there’s a scenario where partial updates need special handling, consider adding a rollback process or more thorough validation.

components/shopify/actions/common/metafield-actions.mjs (4)

117-125: Potential edge case in getMetafields().
Accessing nested keys could fail if results or results[key] is undefined. Consider adding checks or error handling.

---

126-174: No default case for unrecognized ownerResource.
Consider handling an else scenario if the resource doesn't match. This prevents undefined resourceFn or resourceKeys.

---

175-185: Use .find() instead of .filter() if only one metafield is needed.
This would simplify returning the first matched metafield.

---

187-189: Consider returning an empty array.
Currently returns early if metafieldsOriginal is falsy, potentially returning undefined. An empty array might be more consistent.

components/shopify/actions/create-product-variant/create-product-variant.mjs (4)

30-34: Price property is typed as string.
Consider numeric or validation to avoid unexpected behavior.

---

66-71: Weight property typed as string.
Consider numeric type or input validation if weight must be a number.

---

91-108: getOptionValues() approach.
Works well for retrieving product option IDs. Consider error handling if product retrieval fails.

---

115-146: Final variant creation logic.
Parses metafields, handles user errors, and returns summary. Consider numeric parsing for price/weight.

components/shopify/actions/create-product/create-product.mjs (1)

77-80: Static analysis hint: consider optional chaining.
You can simplify:

- media: this.images && this.images.map((image) => ({
+ media: this.images?.map((image) => ({

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 77-80: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (4)

39-43: Potential numeric vs. string mismatch
Since Shopify typically expects numeric values for pricing, consider ensuring the GraphQL API accepts a string or convert to numeric types.

---

44-49: Clarify image usage
This field expects a URL string. Consider additional validation or a short usage note to avoid invalid URLs at runtime.

---

62-67: Weight property type
Weight is stored as a string. If needed, parse or convert to numeric to avoid confusion or type mismatches.

---

68-79: Explicit weight units
Providing pre-defined units is great for consistency and validation. Consider a default fallback if none is provided.

components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (3)

196-215: productOptionIds
Collecting all option values from the product. The approach is solid, but confirm how you handle large product catalogs with many options.

---

320-346: Helper method getPropOptions
Centralizing resource retrieval is excellent for code reuse. Adding a breadcrumb for debugging or logging might be helpful in the future.

---

460-485: Pagination generator
Streaming items in a loop is good for large data sets. Confirm the memory usage if max isn’t set; repeated calls could load many nodes.

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (1)

134-134: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect summary message

The success message incorrectly states "Created new product variant" but this action is updating an existing variant.

- $.export("$summary", `Created new product variant \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].title}\` with ID \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].id}\``);
+ $.export("$summary", `Updated product variant \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].title}\` with ID \`${response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.productVariants[0].id}\``);

components/shopify/actions/get-metaobjects/get-metaobjects.mjs (2)

22-34: New implementation with GraphQL API support

The new run method efficiently retrieves metaobjects using the updated API. The summary message handling with singular/plural forms is a nice touch for user feedback.

However, consider adding pagination support for scenarios where the number of metaobjects exceeds MAX_LIMIT.

async run({ $ }) {
  const response = await this.shopify.listMetaobjects({
    type: this.type.label,
    first: MAX_LIMIT,
  });

  const numObjects = (response.metaobjects.nodes).length;
+ // Add pagination handling if endpoint supports it
+ // const hasNextPage = response.metaobjects.pageInfo?.hasNextPage;
+ // if (hasNextPage) {
+ //   $.export("$summary", `Retrieved ${numObjects} metaobjects. More exist but were not fetched due to pagination limits.`);
+ // } else {
  $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${numObjects} metaobject${numObjects === 1
    ? ""
    : "s"}`);
+ // }

  return response;
},

---

22-34: Add error handling for robustness

While the implementation works correctly, consider adding error handling to provide more helpful feedback when API calls fail.

async run({ $ }) {
+  try {
    const response = await this.shopify.listMetaobjects({
      type: this.type.label,
      first: MAX_LIMIT,
    });

    const numObjects = (response.metaobjects.nodes).length;
    $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${numObjects} metaobject${numObjects === 1
      ? ""
      : "s"}`);

    return response;
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.log("Error retrieving metaobjects", error);
+    throw `Error retrieving metaobjects: ${error.message}`;
+  }
},

components/shopify/actions/search-products/search-products.mjs (5)

98-98: Remove debug console.log statement.

This console.log statement appears to be leftover from debugging and should be removed from production code.

-    console.log(query);

---

82-83: Add error handling for ID processing.

The getIdFromGid utility function could potentially fail with invalid IDs. Consider adding error handling to make the component more robust.

-      const idArray = this.productIds.map((id) => `id:${utils.getIdFromGid(id)}`);
-      queryArray.push(`(${idArray.join(" OR ")})`);
+      try {
+        const idArray = this.productIds.map((id) => `id:${utils.getIdFromGid(id)}`);
+        if (idArray.length > 0) {
+          queryArray.push(`(${idArray.join(" OR ")})`);
+        }
+      } catch (error) {
+        console.error("Error processing product IDs:", error);
+        throw new Error(`Failed to process product IDs: ${error.message}`);
+      }

---

111-114: Consider server-side filtering for better performance.

Client-side filtering for title matches could be inefficient for large result sets. If possible, consider including this filter in the initial query to reduce the amount of data transferred.

---

116-118: Use slice() for array truncation.

Directly modifying the length property to truncate an array is unconventional. Using slice() is more readable and follows common JavaScript patterns.

-    if (products.length > this.maxResults) {
-      products.length = this.maxResults;
-    }
+    products = products.slice(0, this.maxResults);

---

120-122: Simplify pluralization logic.

The ternary expression for pluralization can be simplified for better readability.

-    $.export("$summary", `Found ${products.length} product${products.length === 1
-      ? ""
-      : "s"} matching search criteria`);
+    $.export("$summary", `Found ${products.length} product${products.length === 1 ? "" : "s"} matching search criteria`);

components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (5)

14-81: Consistent dynamic prop definitions for blog/article/product.

Each prop definition (blogId, articleId, productId, productVariantId) follows a uniform pattern, leveraging this.getPropOptions to load entities dynamically. Consider adding a more descriptive fallback or user-friendly error message if the underlying Shopify queries fail, as this would improve the developer experience.

---

82-163: Uniform dynamic prop handling for collections, pages, metaobjects, and locations.

Similar to the above, these prop definitions (collectionId, pageId, metaobjectType, metaobjectId, locationId) maintain consistency. The architecture is sound, but you might consider logging or user feedback if the API returns no or partial results, to guide app users.

---

164-216: Potential duplication with inventoryItemId retrieval logic.

The inventoryItemId logic manually paginates product variants to build options, replicating the core approach of getPropOptions. You could unify this within getPropOptions for DRY consistency.

For instance:

- let {
-   productVariants: {
-     nodes, pageInfo,
-   },
- } = await this.listProductVariants(variables);
- ...
- return {
-   options: nodes?.map(...),
-   context: { after: pageInfo?.endCursor },
- };
+ return this.getPropOptions({
+   resourceFn: this.listProductVariants,
+   resourceKeys: ["productVariants"],
+   valueKey: "id",
+   labelKey: "title", 
+   prevContext,
+   variables,
+ });

---

248-319: Robust retry handling for Shopify GraphQL calls.

_withRetries gracefully handles throttling via exponential backoff. However, consider adding distinct error messages for credential or permission failures separate from throttling scenarios, guiding users toward resolving authentication errors more easily.

---

347-462: Comprehensive CRUD operations.

All create, list, update, and delete methods are consistently designed, each mapped to GraphQL mutations or queries. This fosters a uniform development experience when building new Shopify integrations. If feasible, add JSDoc or in-code comments for each method to clarify required variables and expected responses.

components/shopify/actions/create-metafield/create-metafield.mjs (1)

50-66: New async run method implements GraphQL API correctly

The new implementation properly uses the GraphQL API to create metafields with good error handling. The method:

1. Constructs the mutation input correctly
2. Properly handles user errors from the GraphQL response
3. Provides a clear summary message upon success

One suggestion to improve error handling:

Consider adding more context to the error message to help troubleshoot issues:

- throw new Error(response.metafieldDefinitionCreate.userErrors[0].message);
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create metafield: ${response.metafieldDefinitionCreate.userErrors[0].message}`);

components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (2)

244-260: Eliminate confusion around “update” naming.
This mutation’s content is identical to SET_METAFIELD, but the naming suggests different behavior. If you do keep both, clarify the distinction or rename them to reflect nuanced differences (e.g. “upsert” vs “set”).

---

1-462:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Refine the architectural organization of GraphQL queries.
This file bundles all create, update, and delete mutation strings for multiple Shopify resources into a single large module. While it works, it might be more maintainable to split these into smaller domain-specific files or to employ fragments/shared bits for repeated fields (e.g. userErrors, IDs).

Double-check compatibility with the new GraphQL API.
Please ensure these mutations exactly match the fields and schemas for Shopify’s most recent GraphQL API version.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check usage references for newly introduced GraphQL constants
rg 'CREATE_WEBHOOK|DELETE_WEBHOOK|ADD_TAGS|ADD_PRODUCTS_TO_COLLECTION|CREATE_ARTICLE|CREATE_BLOG|CREATE_COLLECTION|CREATE_PAGE|CREATE_PRODUCT|CREATE_PRODUCT_VARIANTS|SET_METAFIELD|CREATE_METAFIELD|CREATE_METAOBJECT|UPDATE_METAFIELD|UPDATE_METAOBJECT|UPDATE_PRODUCT|UPDATE_ARTICLE|UPDATE_PAGE|UPDATE_INVENTORY_LEVEL|UPDATE_PRODUCT_VARIANT|DELETE_ARTICLE|DELETE_BLOG|DELETE_PAGE|DELETE_METAFIELD' -A 10

Length of output: 29344

---

Action: Consider Modularizing GraphQL Mutations and Verify Their API Compatibility

• The current module in components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs centralizes all Shopify mutation strings. For long-term maintainability, consider splitting these into smaller, domain-specific files (for example, separating mutations for articles, products, metafields, etc.). This can also pave the way for using shared GraphQL fragments for repeated field sets like userErrors and common identifiers.
• Verify that every mutation exactly matches the fields and schema from Shopify’s latest GraphQL API. Given the widespread usage in files like components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs and related modules, a careful review of the API documentation is recommended to ensure compatibility when Shopify makes updates.

components/shopify/actions/update-product-variant/update-product-variant.mjs (1)

131-133: Consider showing all validation errors

The error handling only throws the first user error. Consider including all error messages in the thrown error for better debugging.

-    if (response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.userErrors.length > 0) {
-      throw new Error(response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.userErrors[0].message);
+    const userErrors = response.productVariantsBulkUpdate.userErrors;
+    if (userErrors.length > 0) {
+      throw new Error(userErrors.map(error => error.message).join("; "));
     }

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (3)

260-319: Robust retry mechanism implementation for handling API throttling

The implementation of the retry mechanism for GraphQL requests is well thought out. It handles Shopify's throttling limits gracefully and includes detailed error logging.

A few suggestions to enhance this implementation:

1. Consider extracting retry configuration to constants or make them configurable
2. Use a more structured logging approach instead of template literals with console.log

- retryOpts = {
-   retries: 5,
-   factor: 2,
-   minTimeout: 2000, // In milliseconds
- },
+ retryOpts = {
+   retries: RETRY_ATTEMPTS, // Define this in constants.mjs
+   factor: RETRY_FACTOR,    // Define this in constants.mjs
+   minTimeout: RETRY_MIN_TIMEOUT, // In milliseconds
+ },

- console.log(`
-   [Attempt #${retryCount}] Temporary error: ${err.message}
- `);
+ console.log(`[Attempt #${retryCount}] Temporary error: ${err.message}`);

---

320-346: Reusable prop options utility simplifies dynamic dropdowns

The getPropOptions utility centralizes the logic for creating dynamic dropdown options, reducing code duplication across property definitions. This approach makes the code more maintainable and consistent.

One enhancement to consider would be implementing a caching mechanism for frequently used options to reduce API calls, especially for resources that don't change often.

---

287-318: Error formatting in _withRetries could be improved

The error formatting in the _withRetries method creates a multi-line error message with indentation, which might not render well in logs or error reporting systems.

- return bail(new Error(`
-   Unexpected error (error code: ${errCode}):
-   ${JSON.stringify(errData, null, 2)}
- `));
+ return bail(new Error(`Unexpected error (error code: ${errCode}): ${JSON.stringify(errData)}`));

components/shopify/common/mutations.mjs (1)

418-442: Consider switching to named exports for better maintainability.

With so many mutation constants, explicit named exports (instead of a large default export) can improve clarity and enable tree-shaking in modern bundlers. For example:

-export default {
-  CREATE_WEBHOOK,
-  DELETE_WEBHOOK,
-  ...
-};
+export {
+  CREATE_WEBHOOK,
+  DELETE_WEBHOOK,
+  ...
+};

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

components/planday/planday.app.mjs (3)

1-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove or complete this implementation - unrelated to Shopify migration.

This new file appears to be a skeleton for a Planday app integration but seems unrelated to the PR objectives of migrating Shopify to the updated GraphQL API. The current implementation only contains a debugging method and empty prop definitions.

If this is just boilerplate for future work, it should be removed from this PR and submitted in a separate PR focused on the Planday integration. If this is somehow related to the Shopify migration, please clarify the connection.

---

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Security concern: Remove console logging of authentication keys.

The authKeys() method logs authentication data to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information. Authentication data should never be logged in production code.

If this is debugging code, it should be removed before merging. If you need to inspect auth keys during development, consider using more secure debugging approaches.

---

3-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Incorrect app configuration for Shopify migration.

This file defines an app configuration for "planday", but according to the PR objectives, this PR is focused on migrating Shopify to use the updated GraphQL API.

If this is intended to be part of a different feature, it should be submitted in a separate PR.

components/netcore/netcore.app.mjs (1)

1-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

Security concern: Potential sensitive information logging

The authKeys() method logs authentication information to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive credentials in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that should not be present in production code.

Additionally, this file seems to be just a skeleton for a Netcore integration with minimal functionality. Consider:

1. Adding proper JSDoc comments describing the purpose of this app
2. Implementing actual integration methods for interacting with Netcore APIs
3. Including error handling for API interactions

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "netcore",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual API methods for Netcore integration
  },
};

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "netcore",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Add actual API methods for Netcore integration
  },
};

components/minerstat/minerstat.app.mjs (1)

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove or secure debugging code before merging to production.

The authKeys() method contains a console.log statement that outputs authentication keys, which could potentially expose sensitive information. This appears to be debugging code that should either be removed before merging to production or secured behind a development-only flag.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

If this method is necessary for development purposes, consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and ensuring it's only used in development environments.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs (1)

6-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove or enhance debugging method before production.

The authKeys() method appears to be a debugging function that logs authentication keys to the console. This should either be:

1. Removed before pushing to production
2. Enhanced with proper documentation if intended for developer use
3. Replaced with a more secure approach that doesn't potentially expose sensitive auth information

Console logging is generally not appropriate for production code, especially when handling authentication data.

-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add production-ready methods for Jenkins API interactions here

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Add production-ready methods for Jenkins API interactions here

components/docker_engine/docker_engine.app.mjs (1)

6-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Security concern: Avoid logging authentication information.

The authKeys() method logs authentication data to the console, which could expose sensitive information. Consider removing this method or limiting what gets logged in production environments.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },
+ // Helper method for debugging (not for production use)
+ authKeys() {
+   // Only log non-sensitive keys or use appropriate log levels
+   console.log("Auth object contains the following keys:", Object.keys(this.$auth));
+ },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Helper method for debugging (not for production use)
    authKeys() {
      // Only log non-sensitive keys or use appropriate log levels
      console.log("Auth object contains the following keys:", Object.keys(this.$auth));
    },

components/dungeon_fighter_online/dungeon_fighter_online.app.mjs (1)

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debugging code with potential security implications

The authKeys() method uses console.log to output authentication keys, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. If this method is intended for debugging, it shouldn't be committed to production code.

Consider one of these approaches:

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },
+ // Return keys if needed for implementation
+ getAuthKeys() {
+   return Object.keys(this.$auth);
+ },

Or remove it completely if not needed for the app's functionality.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Return keys if needed for implementation
    getAuthKeys() {
      return Object.keys(this.$auth);
    },

components/google_marketplace/google_marketplace.app.mjs (1)

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove or protect debug console.log statements

Debug statements using console.log should not be left in production code, especially when they might expose sensitive authentication information. Consider:

1. Removing this method entirely if it's only for debugging
2. Adding a debug flag/condition to only log in development environments
3. Ensuring no sensitive data is exposed in logs

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },
+ // Example of a safer approach if debugging is needed
+ debug(message, data) {
+   if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
+     console.log(`[Google Marketplace] ${message}`, data ? data : '');
+   }
+ },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Example of a safer approach if debugging is needed
    debug(message, data) {
      if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
        console.log(`[Google Marketplace] ${message}`, data ? data : '');
      }
    },

components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs (2)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

App module appears incomplete.

This appears to be a minimal skeleton for an app integration rather than a complete implementation. The module lacks API integration methods and proper property definitions that would be expected in a functional app module.

Consider enhancing this module with proper API integration methods and necessary property definitions, or postpone its addition until it's more complete.

---

6-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove console logging of authentication data.

The authKeys() method logs authentication information to the console, which presents a security risk in production environments. Authentication details should never be logged.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // this.$auth contains connected account data

components/leverly/leverly.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Debug code should be removed or refactored for production use

This appears to be a skeleton app definition with a debugging method that only logs authentication keys to the console. While this structure follows Pipedream's app pattern, the authKeys() method has several issues:

1. It uses console.log() which is typically meant for debugging, not production code
2. It doesn't handle potential errors if this.$auth is undefined
3. It doesn't return any value or provide functionality beyond logging

Consider either:

• Removing this debugging method if it's not needed for production
• Enhancing it to provide actual functionality and proper error handling
• Adding proper documentation explaining the purpose of this app

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "leverly",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Example of a more robust authentication method
+    authKeys() {
+      try {
+        const keys = Object.keys(this.$auth || {});
+        return keys;
+      } catch (error) {
+        console.error("Error accessing authentication data:", error.message);
+        return [];
+      }
+    },
  },
};

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "leverly",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Example of a more robust authentication method
    authKeys() {
      try {
        const keys = Object.keys(this.$auth || {});
        return keys;
      } catch (error) {
        console.error("Error accessing authentication data:", error.message);
        return [];
      }
    },
  },
};

components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs (3)

1-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

App definition is missing key Neo4j connectivity features

This file appears to be a skeleton for a Neo4j AuraDB integration, but it lacks essential functionality for connecting to and interacting with Neo4j databases. In its current state, it's not usable for actual Neo4j operations.

Consider adding methods to:

• Establish connection to Neo4j using the driver
• Execute Cypher queries
• Handle database transactions
• Implement proper error handling

---

4-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Define required property definitions for Neo4j connectivity

The empty propDefinitions object means users won't be able to configure necessary connection parameters.

Add property definitions for essential Neo4j connection parameters:

-  propDefinitions: {},
+  propDefinitions: {
+    url: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "Database URL",
+      description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB connection URL (e.g., neo4j+s://xxxxxxxx.databases.neo4j.io)",
+    },
+    username: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "Username",
+      description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database username",
+    },
+    password: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "Password",
+      secret: true,
+      description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database password",
+    },
+  },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  propDefinitions: {
    url: {
      type: "string",
      label: "Database URL",
      description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB connection URL (e.g., neo4j+s://xxxxxxxx.databases.neo4j.io)",
    },
    username: {
      type: "string",
      label: "Username",
      description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database username",
    },
    password: {
      type: "string",
      label: "Password",
      secret: true,
      description: "Your Neo4j AuraDB database password",
    },
  },

---

6-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debugging code that logs authentication information

The authKeys() method appears to be debugging code that logs authentication information, which could expose sensitive data and should not be included in production code.

Replace this debugging method with actual Neo4j connection and operational methods:

-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Connect to Neo4j database using credentials from auth
+    async getClient() {
+      const { url, username, password } = this.$auth;
+      
+      // Implement Neo4j driver initialization here
+      // Example: 
+      // const neo4j = require('neo4j-driver');
+      // const driver = neo4j.driver(url, neo4j.auth.basic(username, password));
+      // return driver;
+      
+      throw new Error("Neo4j client implementation not completed");
+    },
+    
+    // Execute a Cypher query
+    async runQuery(query, params = {}) {
+      const driver = await this.getClient();
+      const session = driver.session();
+      
+      try {
+        return await session.run(query, params);
+      } finally {
+        await session.close();
+      }
+    },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Connect to Neo4j database using credentials from auth
    async getClient() {
      const { url, username, password } = this.$auth;
      
      // Implement Neo4j driver initialization here
      // Example: 
      // const neo4j = require('neo4j-driver');
      // const driver = neo4j.driver(url, neo4j.auth.basic(username, password));
      // return driver;
      
      throw new Error("Neo4j client implementation not completed");
    },
    
    // Execute a Cypher query
    async runQuery(query, params = {}) {
      const driver = await this.getClient();
      const session = driver.session();
      
      try {
        return await session.run(query, params);
      } finally {
        await session.close();
      }
    },

components/egestor/egestor.app.mjs (1)

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove or replace debug console.log statement

The authKeys() method uses console.log() to output authentication keys, which is not appropriate for production code. Logging authentication-related information, even just the key names, could expose sensitive information in logs.

authKeys() {
-  console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
+  return Object.keys(this.$auth);
}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    authKeys() {
      return Object.keys(this.$auth);
    },

components/aws/actions/s3-upload-file-tmp/s3-upload-file-tmp.mjs (1)

111-113: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider validating that paths begin with /tmp for security.

While the error message mentions "/tmp", there's no explicit validation that the provided path actually starts with "/tmp", which could be a security concern.

if (!fs.existsSync(path)) {
  throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path \`${path}\` does not exist. Please verify the path and include the leading /tmp if needed.`);
}
+ if (!path.startsWith('/tmp/') && path !== '/tmp') {
+   throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path must be within the /tmp directory for security reasons.`);
+ }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    if (!fs.existsSync(path)) {
      throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path \`${path}\` does not exist. Please verify the path and include the leading /tmp if needed.`);
    }
    if (!path.startsWith('/tmp/') && path !== '/tmp') {
      throw new ConfigurationError(`The file or directory path must be within the /tmp directory for security reasons.`);
    }

components/data_stores/actions/add-update-multiple-records/add-update-multiple-records.mjs (1)

113-116: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Inconsistent property naming in return value.

While the TTL functionality works correctly, there's an inconsistency in how TTL is included in the return value. In this file, it's returned as _ttl while in other data store actions it's returned as ttl (without the underscore).

For consistency with other data store actions, consider changing:

  return {
    ...map,
-   _ttl: this.ttl || null,
+   ttl: this.ttl || null,
  };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    return {
      ...map,
      ttl: this.ttl || null,
    };

components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs (3)

4-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement required Microsoft Teams API integration methods

The app file only contains an empty propDefinitions object and a single debugging method. For a functional integration, you should implement methods that interact with the Microsoft Teams API, such as authentication, data fetching, and webhook handling.

Consider adding methods like:

methods: {
  // Return auth keys
  authKeys() {
    return Object.keys(this.$auth);
  },
  
  // Make API requests to Microsoft Teams
  async makeRequest(path, options = {}) {
    const url = `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/${path}`;
    
    return await axios({
      url,
      headers: {
        Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`,
        ...options.headers,
      },
      ...options,
    });
  },
  
  // Get team events
  async getEvents(teamId, params = {}) {
    return this.makeRequest(`teams/${teamId}/events`, {
      params,
    });
  },
},

---

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove debugging console.log statement

The authKeys() method contains a console.log statement that appears to be for debugging purposes. Console logs should be removed from production code as they can clutter logs and potentially leak sensitive information.

 authKeys() {
-  console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
+  // Return keys instead of logging them
+  return Object.keys(this.$auth);
 },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    authKeys() {
      // Return keys instead of logging them
      return Object.keys(this.$auth);
    },

---

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

This file seems unrelated to the PR's objective of "Shopify - Migrate to Updated GraphQL API"

This new file creates a Microsoft Teams Events app module, but according to the PR objectives, this pull request is focused on updating Shopify components to utilize the latest GraphQL API. It's unclear how this Microsoft Teams file relates to that objective.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if this file is mentioned in any commit messages related to this PR
git log --grep="microsoft_teams_events" --oneline

Length of output: 0

---

Once this script is executed, if no commits indicate an intentional addition of the Microsoft Teams Events functionality for this PR, then it confirms that the file is unrelated to the Shopify migration objective.

If the commit history still shows no evidence of integration with the GraphQL API update for Shopify, please clarify the purpose of this file—if it’s not meant to be part of the current PR, consider removing it or moving it to a dedicated PR.

Action Required: Clarify or Remove Unrelated Microsoft Teams Events File

• The file components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs introduces Microsoft Teams events functionality, which doesn’t align with the current PR's goal of updating Shopify components to use the updated GraphQL API.
• The commit log search did not reveal any indication of an intended link between this file and the Shopify migration.
• Please verify whether this file is meant to be included in this PR. If it is unrelated, remove it or document its purpose clearly to avoid confusion.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the commit history specifically for the file to verify its intended inclusion
git log --oneline -- components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs

Length of output: 0

---

Once executed, if the output remains empty (i.e. no GraphQL or Shopify-related terms are found in this file), it strongly suggests that the Microsoft Teams Events module is unrelated to the current PR’s objective. This discrepancy between PR intent and file content needs to be resolved.

Action Required: Remove or Clarify Inclusion of Microsoft Teams Events Module

• File: components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs
• Observation: The file contains functionality solely for Microsoft Teams events and lacks any references to Shopify or GraphQL.
• Commit History: No commit messages or history indicate an intention to link this file to the Shopify GraphQL API migration.
• Recommendation: If this file is not part of the Shopify migration effort, please remove it or provide clear documentation/explanation for its inclusion.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any GraphQL references in the file to verify if it relates to Shopify's GraphQL API update
grep "GraphQL" components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs

Length of output: 79

---

Action Required: Clarify or Remove Unrelated Microsoft Teams Module

• The file components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs contains code solely for Microsoft Teams events and does not include any references to Shopify or GraphQL.
• Commit history checks for this file reveal no evidence linking its inclusion to the Shopify migration.
• It is unclear why this file is part of a PR focused on updating Shopify components.

Please confirm whether this file is intentionally included. If it is unrelated to the Shopify migration, consider removing it or providing clear documentation to justify its inclusion.

components/greenhouse_job_board_api/greenhouse_job_board_api.app.mjs (2)

5-10: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Review the authKeys() method for potential security implications.

The authKeys() method is logging authentication-related information to the console, which could expose sensitive data in logs. If this is intended for debugging purposes only, consider:

1. Adding a warning comment indicating it's for development use only
2. Implementing proper debug flag checking before logging
3. Ensuring this doesn't run in production environments

Additionally, this method doesn't actually use the logged information or return any values, making its purpose unclear.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if similar debug methods exist in other app files to understand the pattern
echo "Checking for similar auth logging patterns in other app files..."
rg -A 2 "console.log.*this.\$auth" --type js

Length of output: 184

---

Action: Restrict or remove debugging output in the authKeys() method.

• The method logs keys from this.$auth, which may expose authentication-related data if left enabled in production.
• If the logging is intended solely for development, add a clear warning comment and wrap the log statement in a check (e.g., a debug flag or environment variable) to prevent its execution in production.
• Consider whether this method is needed at all outside debugging—if not, remove it or ensure its sole use during development.

---

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Minimal implementation with no actual API functionality.

This appears to be just a skeleton implementation for the Greenhouse Job Board API integration. There are no methods defined for making API requests, handling responses, or implementing any actual functionality that would enable interaction with the Greenhouse API.

If this is intended as a starting point for future development:

1. Consider adding TODOs with a roadmap for implementation
2. Include basic API request methods (e.g., makeRequest)
3. Document expected authentication method and required credentials

If this is meant to be a complete implementation, it's missing critical functionality needed to interact with the Greenhouse Job Board API.

---

🌐 Web query:

What are the main endpoints and authentication requirements for the Greenhouse Job Board API?

💡 Result:

The Greenhouse Job Board API enables custom career site development and candidate application processing. Here's a technical breakdown of its key components:

Main Endpoints

Endpoint	Method	Description	Authentication Required
/v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs	GET	Lists published jobs	No [5][10]
/v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}	GET	Retrieves detailed job post	No [5][10]
/v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}	POST	Submits candidate application	Yes [2][5][6]
/v1/boards/{board_token}/offices	GET	Lists company offices	No [5][10]
/v1/boards/{board_token}/departments	GET	Lists company departments	No [5][10]

Key optional parameters for GET jobs endpoint:

• content=true includes full job descriptions
• questions=true adds custom application questions
• pay_transparency=true shows salary ranges [5][10]

Authentication Requirements

• Read operations (GET endpoints) require only a board_token from the career site URL (e.g., acme from boards.greenhouse.io/acme) [2][5]
• Write operations (POST applications) require:
  • Base64-encoded API key in Basic Auth header
  • API key generated in Greenhouse Dev Center [2][5]
  • JSON payload with candidate data and compliance info [6]

Example authentication header for application submission:

const basicAuth = btoa(`${API_KEY}:`);
headers: {
  'Authorization': `Basic ${basicAuth}`,
  'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}

Key Features

• Supports JSONP callbacks for cross-domain requests [5][10]
• Cached responses with no rate limits for read operations [2][6]
• GDPR compliance fields in application payloads [2][6]
• Custom question handling through questions parameter [5][10]

Developers should note that while most endpoints are publicly accessible, application submissions require strict authentication and proper handling of candidate data compliance regulations [2][5][6]. The API provides granular control over job post displays while maintaining security for candidate data ingestion.

Citations:

• 1: https://support.greenhouse.io/hc/en-us/articles/10568627186203-Greenhouse-API-overview
• 2: https://dev.to/superface/get-started-with-greenhouse-apis-overview-and-authentication-2ip0
• 3: https://www.merge.dev/integrations/greenhouse-job-board-api
• 4: https://github.com/grnhse/greenhouse-api-docs/blob/master/source/includes/candidate-ingestion/_introduction.md
• 5: https://developers.greenhouse.io/job-board.html
• 6: https://www.bitoff.org/greenhouse-recruiting-api/
• 7: https://www.drupal.org/project/gh_jobs
• 8: https://www.getknit.dev/blog/greenhouse-api
• 9: https://hitchhikers.yext.com/docs/connectors/greenhouse-native-source/
• 10: https://github.com/grnhse/greenhouse-api-docs/blob/master/source/includes/job-board/_introduction.md
• 11: https://developers.getknit.dev/docs/greenhouse-usecases
• 12: https://docs.merge.dev/integrations/ats/greenhouse/provider-interactions/
• 13: https://www.getknit.dev/blog/get-all-open-jobs-from-greenhouse--api-Nra7dz
• 14: https://www.greenhouse.com/api
• 15: https://github.com/grnhse/greenhouse-api-docs/blob/master/source/includes/job-board/_applications.md

---

Action Required: Expand API Implementation for Complete Greenhouse Integration

This module currently provides only a minimal stub (logging the connected account’s keys) without any actual functionality for communicating with the Greenhouse Job Board API. Based on the official API documentation:

• Missing API Request Methods:

  • Job Listings & Details: Methods to fetch jobs (GET /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs and GET /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}) are absent.
  • Application Submission: There’s no implementation for posting candidate applications (POST /v1/boards/{board_token}/jobs/{job_id}) which requires proper authentication using a Base64-encoded API key in the Basic Auth header.

• Authentication & Documentation Gaps:

  • Read endpoints only need a board token, while write operations require secure credentials.
  • It would be beneficial to include inline documentation or TODO comments outlining these authentication requirements and to document the expected parameters.

Recommendations:

• If this is a starting point:

  • Add clear TODOs outlining future work (e.g., implement makeRequest functions for GET and POST requests, handle API responses, and manage errors).
  • Provide commentary on how authentication should be managed according to the Greenhouse Job Board API’s requirements.

• If intended as a complete integration:

  • Implement the methods to call the proper endpoints and handle both data retrieval and candidate application submissions with appropriate error handling and security measures.

Overall, please review and expand the module to handle the full spectrum of API functionality as per the documented endpoints and authentication flow.

components/griptape/actions/create-assistant/create-assistant.mjs (1)

78-104: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Validate inputs or apply defaults for optional fields.
While the description, knowledgeBaseIds, rulesetIds, structureIds, and toolIds may be logically optional, consider validating them or providing default empty arrays/object values to avoid potential issues (e.g., undefined fields in certain edge cases).

components/kindo/actions/chat/chat.mjs (1)

18-21: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix unclosed string in messages description.

There appears to be an unclosed string literal in the description for the messages property.

-    description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]",
+    description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`",

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      type: "string[]",
      label: "Messages",
      description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`",
    },

components/mollie/mollie.app.mjs (2)

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debugging code before production.

The authKeys() method appears to be debugging code that logs authentication information to the console. This should be removed before merging to production as it:

1. Serves no functional purpose in the application
2. Could potentially log sensitive information
3. Adds unnecessary console output

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

---

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Implement actual Mollie API integration functionality.

This file appears to be a minimal scaffold for the Mollie integration with no actual implementation of API functionality. A proper app file should include:

1. Methods to interact with Mollie API endpoints
2. Proper error handling
3. Property definitions for actions that will use this app

---

🌐 Web query:

What are the main API endpoints or features of the Mollie payment API?

💡 Result:

The Mollie Payment API provides a comprehensive suite of endpoints for managing online payments, refunds, and subscriptions. Here are its core features and endpoints:

Payment Management

• Create Payments:
  Initiate payments with parameters like amount, currency, description, redirect URL, and webhook URL. Supports multicurrency transactions (e.g., USD, EUR)[5][6][10].
  Example request body:

  {
    "amount": {"currency": "EUR", "value": "10.00"},
    "description": "Order #123",
    "redirectUrl": "https://example.com/thank-you",
    "webhookUrl": "https://example.com/webhook"
  }

• Retrieve Payments:
  Fetch payment details using a payment ID to check statuses like paid, failed, or expired[1][7][10].
  Statuses include:

  • PaymentOpen (initial state)
  • PaymentPaid (successful)
  • PaymentRefunded
  • PaymentChargedBack[1][7]

Refunds

• Create Refunds:
  Issue full or partial refunds for eligible payments (excludes gift cards/paysafecard)[3][4][7].
  Example refund request:

  refund = payment.refund!({"amount": {"value": "5.00", "currency": "EUR"}})

• Manage Refunds:
  Endpoints to list, retrieve, or cancel refunds by ID[1][4][10].

Payment Methods

• List Supported Methods:
  Retrieve activated methods (e.g., iDEAL, credit cards, PayPal) with locale-specific details[11][14].
• Method-Specific Parameters:
  Configure options like issuer for iDEAL or billingEmail for bank transfers[4][7].

Advanced Features

• Recurring Payments:
  Support for subscriptions using tokens from initial customer-approved transactions[1][5].
• Orders API:
  Handle pay-after-delivery methods (e.g., Klarna) with order management endpoints[4][8].
• Webhooks:
  Automatically receive payment status updates via configured URLs[2][6][10].

Utility Endpoints

• Customers:
  Store customer profiles for recurring payments[5][9].
• Organizations/Mandates:
  Manage business accounts and payment authorizations[9].
• Settlements:
  Track payouts to bank accounts[9].

Client Libraries

Mollie provides SDKs for languages like PHP, Python, Node.js, and Crystal, simplifying integration with methods like:

mollie_client.payments.create()  # Python
$mollie->payments->create();     # PHP

These libraries handle authentication (via API keys), request formatting, and response parsing[5][6][10][13].

The API supports both test and live modes, with seamless switching using environment-specific keys[2][14]. Pagination and iteration tools are available for large datasets (e.g., listing payments)[10][13].

Citations:

• 1: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mollie-api-haskell-0.2.0.1/docs/Mollie-API-Payments.html
• 2: https://www.dynamicpeople.nl/en/news/mollie-api-amp-power-automate-customer-payment-made-easy/
• 3: https://wout.github.io/mollie.cr/
• 4: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Mollie.Api/3.0.0
• 5: https://packagist.org/packages/mollie/mollie-api-php
• 6: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-python
• 7: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-php
• 8: https://github.com/mollie/spree-mollie-gateway
• 9: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-php/blob/master/src/MollieApiClient.php
• 10: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-node
• 11: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mollie-api-haskell-0.2.0.1/docs/Mollie-API-Methods.html
• 12: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-python/blob/master/v3-api-changes.md
• 13: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@mollie/api-client
• 14: https://woocommerce.com/document/mollie-payments-for-woocommerce/
• 15: https://docs.mollie.com
• 16: https://docs.mollie.com/reference/payments-api
• 17: https://eventespresso.com/wiki/ideal-mollie-payment-gateway/
• 18: https://docs.mollie.com/reference/overview
• 19: https://www.nopcommerce.com/en/mollie-payment-module
• 20: https://github.com/mollie/mollie-api-php/blob/master/src/Endpoints/PaymentEndpoint.php

---

Action Required: Fully Implement Mollie API Integration

The current scaffold in components/mollie/mollie.app.mjs only logs the authentication keys and does not interact with the Mollie Payment API. Given that Mollie's API provides endpoints for creating and retrieving payments, processing refunds, managing payment methods, and more, please update the implementation as follows:

• Integrate Core API Endpoints:

  • Develop methods for creating payments, retrieving their status (e.g., PaymentOpen, PaymentPaid, etc.), and handling refunds.
  • Optionally, include endpoints for recurring payments, webhook handling, and order management, based on business needs.

• Enhance Error Handling:

  • Implement robust error handling to manage API call failures and unexpected responses.

• Expand Property Definitions:

  • Enrich propDefinitions to support the necessary parameters (such as amount, currency, and URLs) for payment actions.

• Environment Configuration:

  • Use environment-specific API keys and configurations to switch seamlessly between test and live modes.

Please refactor the code to include these functionalities and ensure a proper integration with the Mollie Payment API.

components/gmail/sources/new-email-received/new-email-received.mjs (2)

120-361: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider modularizing the additionalProps logic.

The additionalProps method is quite large, handling multiple use cases (polling vs. webhook), validating the service account key, configuring Pub/Sub topics, etc. Extracting some of these steps into helper methods can simplify the code and make it more maintainable.

---

197-216: ⚠️ Potential issue

Potential mismatch in storing and retrieving the topic name.

Within the code for "new" topics, this._topicName is set (lines 197–216). However, elsewhere (e.g., line 628), the code retrieves the topic name using this._getTopicName(), which accesses the DB. This discrepancy (setting _topicName in memory vs. getting topic name from DB) may lead to inconsistencies when the component re-initializes. Consider standardizing on the DB methods (_setTopicName(), _getTopicName()) for consistent persistence.

- this._topicName = topicName;
+ this._setTopicName(topicName);

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

      // Handle topic prop based on topicType selection
      try {
        const authKeyJSON = JSON.parse(this.serviceAccountKeyJson);

        if (this.topicType === "new") {
          // For new topics, generate a name and don't show selection
          const { project_id: projectId } = authKeyJSON;
          const topicName = `projects/${projectId}/topics/${this.convertNameToValidPubSubTopicName(
            uuidv4(),
          )}`;

          newProps.topic = {
            type: "string",
            default: topicName,
            hidden: true, // Hide this for new topics
          };

          // Store for later use
-          this._topicName = topicName;
+          this._setTopicName(topicName);

components/housecall_pro/housecall_pro.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review of new Housecall Pro app integration

This looks like a skeleton for a new Housecall Pro integration. The structure follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, but there are a few considerations:

1. The authKeys() method logs authentication information to the console, which should not be included in production code as it could expose sensitive information.
2. The integration currently lacks any API implementation methods that would be needed for actual functionality.

Consider either:

• Removing the authKeys() debug method
• Adding proper API implementation methods that would actually interact with the Housecall Pro API

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "housecall_pro",
   propDefinitions: {},
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual API methods here
+    // Example:
+    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
+    //   // Implementation
+    // }
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "housecall_pro",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Add actual API methods here
    // Example:
    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
    //   // Implementation
    // }
  },
};

components/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review of new Microsoft Graph API Daemon app integration

This looks like a skeleton for a new Microsoft Graph API integration. While the structure follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, I have the following concerns:

1. The authKeys() method logs authentication information to the console, which should not be included in production code as it could expose sensitive information.
2. The integration currently lacks any API implementation methods that would be needed for actual functionality.

Consider either:

• Removing the debugging authKeys() method
• Adding proper API implementation methods that would actually interact with the Microsoft Graph API
• Implementing proper error handling for API requests

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app",
   propDefinitions: {},
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual API methods here
+    // Example:
+    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
+    //   const url = `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/${endpoint}`;
+    //   const headers = {
+    //     Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`,
+    //     "Content-Type": "application/json",
+    //   };
+    //   // Implementation
+    // }
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Add actual API methods here
    // Example:
    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
    //   const url = `https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/${endpoint}`;
    //   const headers = {
    //     Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`,
    //     "Content-Type": "application/json",
    //   };
    //   // Implementation
    // }
  },
};

components/microsoft_viva_goals/microsoft_viva_goals.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review of new Microsoft Viva Goals app integration

This appears to be a skeleton for a new Microsoft Viva Goals integration. The structure follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, but there are several issues to address:

1. The authKeys() method logs authentication information to the console, which should not be included in production code as it presents a security risk.
2. The integration lacks any API implementation methods required for actual functionality.
3. There's no error handling or authentication configuration defined.

Consider implementing the following changes:

• Remove the debugging authKeys() method
• Add proper API implementation methods for interacting with the Microsoft Viva Goals API
• Implement appropriate error handling and authentication logic

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "microsoft_viva_goals",
   propDefinitions: {},
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual API methods here
+    // Example:
+    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
+    //   // Implementation with proper error handling
+    // },
+    // async getGoals(params = {}) {
+    //   // Implementation to fetch goals
+    // }
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "microsoft_viva_goals",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Add actual API methods here
    // Example:
    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
    //   // Implementation with proper error handling
    // },
    // async getGoals(params = {}) {
    //   // Implementation to fetch goals
    // }
  },
};

components/cloudflare_browser_rendering/cloudflare_browser_rendering.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review of new Cloudflare Browser Rendering app integration

This appears to be a skeleton for a new Cloudflare Browser Rendering integration. While it follows Pipedream's app configuration pattern, there are several concerns:

1. The authKeys() method logs authentication information to the console, which is a security concern and should not be included in production code.
2. The integration doesn't include any methods for actually interacting with the Cloudflare API.
3. There's no error handling or rate limiting implementation.

Consider implementing the following improvements:

• Remove the debugging authKeys() method
• Add proper API implementation methods for interacting with Cloudflare
• Implement error handling and rate limiting

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "cloudflare_browser_rendering",
   propDefinitions: {},
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual API methods here
+    // Example:
+    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
+    //   const url = `https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/${endpoint}`;
+    //   const headers = {
+    //     Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_token}`,
+    //     "Content-Type": "application/json",
+    //   };
+    //   
+    //   try {
+    //     // Implementation with error handling
+    //   } catch (error) {
+    //     // Error handling
+    //   }
+    // }
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "cloudflare_browser_rendering",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Add actual API methods here
    // Example:
    // async makeRequest(endpoint, options = {}) {
    //   const url = `https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/${endpoint}`;
    //   const headers = {
    //     Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.api_token}`,
    //     "Content-Type": "application/json",
    //   };
    //
    //   try {
    //     // Implementation with error handling
    //   } catch (error) {
    //     // Error handling
    //   }
    // }
  },
};

components/hr_cloud/actions/update-employee/update-employee.mjs (1)

63-79: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify array structure in the response.
You reference response[0]?.xFirstName and response[0]?.xLastName. If updateEmployee returns a non-array object or an empty array, this code would break.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Checking all usage references of `updateEmployee` to confirm the shape of returned data
rg "updateEmployee" -A 5

Length of output: 3835

---

Action: Validate Response Array Structure for updateEmployee API

The current implementation directly accesses response[0].xFirstName and response[0].xLastName without verifying that the response is an array with at least one element. This could lead to errors if:

• The API returns a non-array object, or
• The array is empty.

Please add a validation step to check the response type and ensure it has the expected content before accessing its elements. This will make the code more robust against unexpected API responses.

components/firecrawl/common/utils.mjs (1)

26-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enclose raw JSON.parse calls within safe parsing logic.

parseObjectEntries calls JSON.parse(value) directly (line 28) and may throw an exception if value is not valid JSON. To maintain a consistent optional parse policy, consider replacing it with optionalParseAsJSON or adding a try-catch to handle parsing failures gracefully.

-export function parseObjectEntries(value) {
-  const obj = typeof value === "string"
-    ? JSON.parse(value)
-    : value;
-  return Object.fromEntries(
-    Object.entries(obj).map(([ key, value ]) => [
-      key,
-      optionalParseAsJSON(value),
-    ]),
-  );
+export function parseObjectEntries(value) {
+  const obj = typeof value === "string"
+    ? optionalParseAsJSON(value)
+    : value;
+  return Object.fromEntries(
+    Object.entries(obj).map(([key, val]) => [
+      key,
+      optionalParseAsJSON(val),
+    ]),
+  );
}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export function parseObjectEntries(value) {
  const obj = typeof value === "string"
    ? optionalParseAsJSON(value)
    : value;
  return Object.fromEntries(
    Object.entries(obj).map(([key, val]) => [
      key,
      optionalParseAsJSON(val),
    ]),
  );
}

components/govee/actions/retrieve-device-info/retrieve-device-info.mjs (1)

34-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for missing device

The code assumes the device will be found in the list. If a device with the specified ID doesn't exist, device will be undefined and line 42 will throw an error when trying to access device.sku.

 const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices();
 const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
+
+if (!device) {
+  throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`);
+}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices();
    const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
    if (!device) {
      throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`);
    }

components/govee/actions/control-device/control-device.mjs (2)

151-152: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for missing device ID

Similar to the retrieve-device-info action, there's no validation that the device is found before attempting to use it.

 const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices();
 const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
+
+if (!device) {
+  throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`);
+}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices();
    const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
    if (!device) {
      throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`);
    }

---

37-38: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for missing capability

If the specified command type isn't found in the device's capabilities, the code will continue with capability as undefined. This should be handled explicitly.

 const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
 const capability = device?.capabilities?.find(({ type }) => type === commandType);
 const { parameters } = capability ?? {};
+
+if (!capability) {
+  throw new Error(`Command type ${commandType} not found for device ${deviceId}`);
+}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
const capability = device?.capabilities?.find(({ type }) => type === commandType);
const { parameters } = capability ?? {};

if (!capability) {
  throw new Error(`Command type ${commandType} not found for device ${deviceId}`);
}

components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs (1)

138-230: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Incorporate user-provided pageSize in pagination logic
The paginate() method currently sets pagesize to MAX_PAGE_LIMIT, overriding the pageSize property. Support custom pageSize to honor user input.

 args = {
   ...args,
   params: {
     ...args?.params,
     page: 1,
-    pagesize: MAX_PAGE_LIMIT,
+    pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT,
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    async *paginate({
      resourceFn,
      args,
      resourceKey,
      max,
    }) {
      args = {
        ...args,
        params: {
          ...args?.params,
          page: 1,
          pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT,
        },
      };
      let hasMore, count = 0;
      do {
        const response = await resourceFn(args);
        const items = response[resourceKey];
        if (!items?.length) {
          return;
        }
        for (const item of items) {
          yield item;
          if (max && ++count >= max) {
            return;
          }
        }
        hasMore = response.HasMore;
        args.params.page++;
      } while (hasMore);
    },

components/elastic_email/sources/new-email-click/new-email-click.mjs (1)

25-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Inconsistent summary text

The summary message "New event click" doesn't match the component name "New Email Click" and is inconsistent with the pattern used in other similar components.

  getSummary() {
-    return "New event click";
+    return "New Email Click";
  },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    getSummary() {
      return "New Email Click";
    },

components/planday/planday.app.mjs (2)

1-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

Implement proper Planday API integration methods

This appears to be a minimal app scaffold for Planday integration, but it lacks essential functionality. For a production-ready component, you should implement methods for interacting with the Planday API (e.g., authentication, data retrieval, etc.) and include proper property definitions.

Note that this file appears unrelated to the stated PR objectives of migrating Shopify components to an updated GraphQL API. Please clarify if this file should be included in this PR or moved to a separate one.

---

6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove debugging code

The authKeys() method with console.log() is clearly debugging code that shouldn't be committed to production. Either remove this method entirely or replace it with proper documentation and meaningful functionality.

-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/netcore/netcore.app.mjs (1)

5-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace debugging method with proper authentication verification

The authKeys() method appears to be intended for debugging purposes only, as it logs authentication data to the console. This is not recommended for production code.

Consider replacing this with proper auth validation or helper methods that would be useful for the app's actual functionality. If this is truly needed for debugging, add a comment indicating it's for development only.

- // this.$auth contains connected account data
- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },
+ /**
+  * Validates the authentication credentials
+  * @returns {boolean} True if authentication is valid
+  */
+ isAuthenticated() {
+   // Implement actual validation logic based on required auth properties
+   return Boolean(this.$auth.api_key);
+ },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  methods: {
    /**
     * Validates the authentication credentials
     * @returns {boolean} True if authentication is valid
     */
    isAuthenticated() {
      // Implement actual validation logic based on required auth properties
      return Boolean(this.$auth.api_key);
    },
  },

components/microsoft_viva_goals/microsoft_viva_goals.app.mjs (1)

6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove debugging console.log statement

The authKeys() method contains a console.log statement that outputs authentication keys. This could potentially expose sensitive information in logs and is generally not recommended for production code.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add proper methods for interacting with Microsoft Viva Goals API

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // this.$auth contains connected account data
    // Add proper methods for interacting with Microsoft Viva Goals API

components/microsoft_teams_events/microsoft_teams_events.app.mjs (3)

1-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

This Microsoft Teams Events app file seems unrelated to the Shopify API migration PR.

This new file appears to be unrelated to the stated PR objective of updating Shopify components to utilize the latest GraphQL API. Consider moving this file to a separate PR that's focused on Microsoft Teams integration.

---

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add documentation and implement actual functionality.

The file lacks documentation about its purpose and doesn't implement any actual functionality beyond a debugging method. Consider:

1. Adding JSDoc comments explaining the app's purpose
2. Implementing methods that provide actual Microsoft Teams Events functionality
3. Adding proper propDefinitions if needed

---

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debugging code that logs authentication keys.

The authKeys() method logs authentication data to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information. This appears to be debugging code that shouldn't be included in a production PR.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/dungeon_fighter_online/dungeon_fighter_online.app.mjs (1)

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove or secure the debug method that logs authentication information.

The authKeys() method currently logs authentication data to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information if this runs in a production environment. Logging authentication-related information, even if it's just the keys, is generally considered a security risk.

Consider either:

1. Removing this method entirely if it's just for development purposes
2. Adding logic to ensure it only runs in development environments
3. Replacing it with a more secure method that doesn't expose authentication information

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },
+ // Secure alternative if needed for debugging
+ authKeys() {
+   if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
+     console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
+   }
+ },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Secure alternative if needed for debugging
    authKeys() {
      if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
        console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
      }
    },

components/egestor/egestor.app.mjs (1)

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove or update this debug-oriented method before production deployment.

The authKeys() method using console.log appears to be intended for debugging purposes. Console logging is generally discouraged in production code as it can:

1. Expose sensitive information in logs
2. Create unnecessary noise in the console
3. Impact performance in some environments

Consider replacing this with proper logging using a dedicated logging library, or remove it entirely if it's only temporary.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Replace with a proper logging implementation or remove if not needed

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // Replace with a proper logging implementation or remove if not needed

components/leverly/leverly.app.mjs (1)

1-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

Questionable implementation of new app module

This appears to be a newly added app module for "leverly" with minimal implementation. A few concerns:

1. The only method (authKeys) seems to be for debugging purposes, logging authentication keys to the console. Console logging of authentication information could pose a security concern in production.

2. The propDefinitions object is empty, suggesting this may be an incomplete implementation or placeholder.

3. There's no documentation explaining what "leverly" is or how it relates to the Shopify GraphQL API migration mentioned in the PR objectives.

4. No actual functionality is implemented beyond logging authentication keys.

Consider either:

• Removing this file if it's not directly related to the Shopify GraphQL API migration
• Completing the implementation with proper documentation and functionality
• Replacing the debugging method with production-ready API interaction methods

-export default {
-  type: "app",
-  app: "leverly",
-  propDefinitions: {},
-  methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
-  },
-};

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs (2)

6-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace console.log with proper logging mechanism

Using console.log for debugging purposes in production code is not recommended. Consider using Pipedream's logging mechanism or returning the keys instead of logging them.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },
+ authKeys() {
+   return Object.keys(this.$auth);
+ },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    // this.$auth contains connected account data
    authKeys() {
      return Object.keys(this.$auth);
    },

---

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

Add proper authentication methods for Jenkins API

This appears to be a skeleton implementation for a Jenkins app. For a complete integration, you'll need to implement methods for:

• Authentication with Jenkins
• API request handling
• Error handling

Have you considered implementing methods for making API requests to Jenkins? This would typically include functions like _makeRequest() that handle authentication headers and error responses.

---

Enhance Jenkins API Integration

The implementation in components/jenkins/jenkins.app.mjs currently acts as a placeholder. It only logs available authentication keys without providing the robust functionality expected for a production-ready Jenkins integration. To move forward, please consider the following improvements:

• Implement Jenkins Authentication: Introduce dedicated methods to securely authenticate with Jenkins.
• Centralize API Requests: Create a function (e.g., _makeRequest()) that handles API calls, including setting up authentication headers and processing error responses.
• Strengthen Error Handling: Add comprehensive error handling to gracefully manage potential issues arising from API interactions.

These changes will ensure a comprehensive and secure integration with the Jenkins API.

components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

This file appears unrelated to the Shopify GraphQL API migration.

This new Neo4j AuraDB app file seems unrelated to the PR's objective of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. Additionally, this appears to be just a skeleton implementation with minimal functionality:

1. The file only contains a basic app structure with no actual Neo4j functionality
2. The authKeys() method contains a console.log statement that appears to be for debugging purposes
3. There's no error handling or actual Neo4j API integration

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if this file is referenced in any Shopify-related files in this PR

echo "Checking for references to neo4j_auradb in Shopify files..."
rg -l "neo4j_auradb" components/shopify/

# Check if this is part of other unrelated changes in this PR
echo "Checking if there are other Neo4j files in this PR..."
fd -e mjs -e js "neo4j" --exec echo {}

Length of output: 374

---

Action: Address extraneous file inclusion in the PR

The new components/neo4j_auradb/neo4j_auradb.app.mjs file doesn’t appear to play any role in the Shopify GraphQL API migration. Our search confirms that there are no references to it in any Shopify-related code. Moreover, its implementation is just a minimal skeleton with a debug console.log in the authKeys() method and lacks proper Neo4j API integration or error handling.

• If this file is intended as a stub for future Neo4j functionality, please add documentation/comments clarifying its purpose and outline forthcoming enhancements.
• Otherwise, consider removing it from this PR to keep changes focused on the Shopify migration.

components/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjs (1)

45-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling to the run method.

The run method lacks error handling which could lead to unhandled exceptions if the API call fails.

Add try/catch to handle potential API errors:

async run() {
+  try {
    const spreadsheet = await this.googleSheets.getSpreadsheet(this.sheetID);
    return this.processSpreadsheet(spreadsheet);
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error(`Error fetching or processing spreadsheet: ${error.message}`);
+    throw error;
+  }
},

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  async run() {
    try {
      const spreadsheet = await this.googleSheets.getSpreadsheet(this.sheetID);
      return this.processSpreadsheet(spreadsheet);
    } catch (error) {
      console.error(`Error fetching or processing spreadsheet: ${error.message}`);
      throw error;
    }
  },

components/google_marketplace/google_marketplace.app.mjs (2)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

New app module with minimal implementation

This appears to be a skeleton implementation for a Google Marketplace app integration. While the basic structure is in place, the module currently contains minimal functionality with just a debugging method.

Consider:

1. Adding documentation that explains the purpose of this Google Marketplace integration
2. Implementing necessary methods for interacting with the Google Marketplace API
3. Defining required prop definitions for configuration

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "google_marketplace",
   propDefinitions: {},
   methods: {
     // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add methods for interacting with Google Marketplace API
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "google_marketplace",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // this.$auth contains connected account data
    // Add methods for interacting with Google Marketplace API
  },
};

---

7-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debugging code in production

The authKeys() method appears to be for debugging purposes only. Logging authentication-related information to the console could pose a security risk in production environments.

Either:

1. Remove this debugging method entirely, or
2. Enhance it with proper error handling and ensure it's only used during development

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/griptape/actions/delete-assistant/delete-assistant.mjs (1)

18-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding explicit error handling or retries.

Currently, if Griptape returns a 404 or 401 error for the DELETE request, the method will throw from the underlying HTTP call. Adding a try/catch or a custom error message can improve the debugging experience.

components/griptape/actions/update-assistant/update-assistant.mjs (1)

79-86: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding custom error handling in updateAssistant.

A PATCH request may fail (e.g. invalid credentials, missing ID). Adding a try/catch to handle response errors more gracefully can be beneficial.

components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs (3)

4-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Component lacks implementation

This component currently has empty propDefinitions and no functional methods. If this is intended to be a new app integration, it should include the necessary properties and methods to interact with the Hathr AI service.

---

6-9: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debugging code before production deployment

The authKeys() method appears to be debugging code that logs authentication keys to the console. This type of debugging code should not be committed to production repositories as it:

1. May expose sensitive information
2. Creates unnecessary console output
3. Doesn't provide any actual functionality for the component

Consider removing this method if it's not essential for the component's operation.

-  methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
-  },
+  methods: {
+  },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  methods: {
  },

---

1-11: ⚠️ Potential issue

❓ Verification inconclusive

This file appears unrelated to the Shopify GraphQL API migration PR

This new file introduces a "hathr_ai" app component that seems completely unrelated to the PR's stated objective of migrating Shopify components to use the updated GraphQL API. Please verify if this file was intended to be included in this PR.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the file contains any references to 'shopify' or 'graphql'
rg -iE 'shopify|graphql' components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs

Length of output: 116

---

Action Required: Verify Unrelated "hathr_ai" Component Inclusion

The file components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs introduces a "hathr_ai" app component and does not reference any Shopify or GraphQL code. This suggests that it is unrelated to the stated objective of migrating Shopify components to the updated GraphQL API. Please confirm if this file was meant to be part of the PR or should be removed.

• File: components/hathr_ai/hathr_ai.app.mjs (Lines 1–11)
• No references to "shopify" or "graphql" were found upon inspection.

components/firecrawl/common/utils.mjs (1)

26-39: ⚠️ Potential issue

Potential error handling issue in parseObjectEntries

The direct call to JSON.parse(value) on line 28 could throw an exception if value is not valid JSON, which is inconsistent with the error handling approach used elsewhere.

Consider using the optionalParseAsJSON helper here too:

-  const obj = typeof value === "string"
-    ? JSON.parse(value)
-    : value;
+  const obj = typeof value === "string"
+    ? optionalParseAsJSON(value)
+    : value;

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export function parseObjectEntries(value) {
  const obj = typeof value === "string"
    ? optionalParseAsJSON(value)
    : value;
  return Object.fromEntries(
    Object.entries(obj).map(([
      key,
      value,
    ]) => [
      key,
      optionalParseAsJSON(value),
    ]),
  );
}

components/hr_cloud/actions/update-employee/update-employee.mjs (1)

63-79: ⚠️ Potential issue

Handle potential empty or malformed API responses.
This code assumes response is an array with at least one element. If the API returns an empty array or an unexpected response structure, accessing response[0] will throw an error.

You can address this with a defensive check, for example:

async run({ $ }) {
  const response = await this.hrCloud.updateEmployee({
    $,
    data: {
      Id: this.employeeId,
      // ...
    },
  });

- $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated employee: ${response[0].xFirstName} ${response[0].xLastName}`);
+ if (!Array.isArray(response) || !response.length) {
+   throw new Error("No response from updateEmployee. Please verify the API call.");
+ }
+ const [ firstRecord ] = response;
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated employee: ${firstRecord.xFirstName} ${firstRecord.xLastName}`);

  return response;
}

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  async run({ $ }) {
    const response = await this.hrCloud.updateEmployee({
      $,
      data: {
        Id: this.employeeId,
        xPersonalEmail: this.email,
        xFirstName: this.firstName,
        xLastName: this.lastName,
        xAddress1: this.address,
        xCity: this.city,
        xState: this.state,
        xZipCode: this.zip,
      },
    });
    if (!Array.isArray(response) || !response.length) {
      throw new Error("No response from updateEmployee. Please verify the API call.");
    }
    const [ firstRecord ] = response;
    $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated employee: ${firstRecord.xFirstName} ${firstRecord.xLastName}`);
    return response;
  },

components/hr_cloud/actions/create-employee/create-employee.mjs (1)

96-120: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider additional error handling for response validity.
While the code gracefully returns the full response, there is no fallback if the API fails or if the response is not in the expected shape. A defensive check or a try/catch block (with a meaningful error message) could help maintain reliability.

components/hr_cloud/sources/common/base.mjs (1)

31-55: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Gracefully handle invalid timestamps.
The method calls Date.parse(item[tsField]). If item[tsField] is missing or an invalid date, Date.parse returns NaN, which can break your comparison logic and cause NaN to propagate. Consider skipping items or handling invalid timestamps explicitly.

components/brillium/brillium.app.mjs (1)

200-230: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Make the pagination respect custom page size.
The paginate method forces pagesize to MAX_PAGE_LIMIT. If you wish to honor a user-provided pageSize, pass that in through args.params.

 args = {
   ...args,
   params: {
     ...args?.params,
-    page: 1,
-    pagesize: MAX_PAGE_LIMIT,
+    page: args?.params?.page ?? 1,
+    pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT,
   },
 };

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    async *paginate({
      resourceFn,
      args,
      resourceKey,
      max,
    }) {
      args = {
        ...args,
        params: {
          ...args?.params,
          page: args?.params?.page ?? 1,
          pagesize: args?.params?.pagesize ?? MAX_PAGE_LIMIT,
        },
      };
      let hasMore, count = 0;
      do {
        const response = await resourceFn(args);
        const items = response[resourceKey];
        if (!items?.length) {
          return;
        }
        for (const item of items) {
          yield item;
          if (max && ++count >= max) {
            return;
          }
        }
        hasMore = response.HasMore;
        args.params.page++;
      } while (hasMore);
    },

components/google_sheets/google_sheets.app.mjs (1)

73-75: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Type change from array to single string may cause compatibility issues

The worksheetIDs property has been changed from string[] (array of strings) to string (single string), along with modified labels and descriptions that now indicate a single worksheet rather than multiple worksheets. However, the getSheetValues method (lines 342-372) still appears to expect an array of worksheet IDs, converting the input to a Set and filtering multiple worksheet IDs.

This type change could cause runtime errors if other components are passing this property to methods like getSheetValues that expect an array.

-  worksheetIDs: {
-    type: "string",
-    label: "Worksheet ID",
-    description: "Select a worksheet or provide a worksheet ID",
+  worksheetIDs: {
+    type: "string[]",
+    label: "Worksheet(s)",
+    description: "Select worksheets or provide worksheet IDs",

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if any other files are using the worksheetIDs property and how they handle it

# Check for usage of worksheetIDs across the codebase
rg -A 3 -B 3 "worksheetIDs" --glob "!components/google_sheets/google_sheets.app.mjs"

# Check for methods that call getSheetValues to see how they're using worksheetIDs
rg -A 5 "getSheetValues" --glob "!components/google_sheets/google_sheets.app.mjs"

Length of output: 16745

---

Update the worksheetIDs property to use an array type for compatibility

The verification confirms that across the codebase, properties and helper methods (e.g. in new-row-added.mjs, new-updates.mjs, and various action files) consistently treat worksheetIDs as an array (evidenced by calls to .map, use of .length, etc.). This indicates that changing the type to a single string would break functionality in methods such as getSheetValues.

Action items:

• Revert the property definition so that worksheetIDs is typed as a "string[]".

• Update the label and description accordingly (e.g. from "Worksheet ID" to "Worksheet(s)" and adjust the description) as shown in the diff snippet:

  -  worksheetIDs: {
  -    type: "string",
  -    label: "Worksheet ID",
  -    description: "Select a worksheet or provide a worksheet ID",
  +  worksheetIDs: {
  +    type: "string[]",
  +    label: "Worksheet(s)",
  +    description: "Select worksheets or provide worksheet IDs",

• Ensure that methods expecting an array (like getSheetValues) continue to function by receiving an array as intended.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  worksheetIDs: {
    type: "string[]",
    label: "Worksheet(s)",
    description: "Select worksheets or provide worksheet IDs",
  },

components/shopify/actions/search-product-variant/search-product-variant.mjs (1)

113-118: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add check for empty search results

The code extracts values from search results without first checking if nodes array is empty, which could lead to errors.

Add a check to handle empty search results:

+ if (response.productVariants && response.productVariants.nodes.length === 0) {
+   if (!this.createIfNotFound) {
+     throw new Error(`No product variant found with title: ${this.title}`);
+   }
+ } else {
    const title = response.productVariants
      ? response.productVariants.nodes[0].title
      : response.productVariant.title;
    const id = response.productVariants
      ? response.productVariants.nodes[0].id
      : response.productVariant.id;
    $.export("$summary", `Found product variant \`${title}\` with ID \`${id}\``);
    return response;
+ }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

New app implementation requires further development

This appears to be a skeleton implementation for a new currents_api app. There are several areas that should be addressed before this is production-ready:

1. The authKeys() method contains a console.log statement which isn't appropriate for production code - it could expose sensitive information and clutter logs.
2. There's no error handling implemented.
3. No actual API methods are defined beyond the debugging utility.
4. Documentation is minimal with no explanation of the app's purpose or API functionality.

Additionally, it's unclear how this new currents_api app relates to the PR's objective of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. Is this file meant to be included in this PR?

Consider refactoring this implementation to:

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "currents_api",
   propDefinitions: {},
+  /**
+   * @description Documentation about the Currents API app
+   */
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    /**
+     * @description Get authentication keys
+     * @returns {string[]} Array of authentication keys
+     */
+    authKeys() {
+      try {
+        return Object.keys(this.$auth);
+      } catch (error) {
+        console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error);
+        return [];
+      }
+    },
+    // Add actual API methods here
   },
 };

---

Below is a shell script to verify the current contents of the file, followed by the final rewritten review comment.

---

Shell Script for Verification

The following script checks for the existence of the file and highlights the usage of any console.log statements within it:

---

Final Rewritten Review Comment

Currents API App: Refactor for Production Readiness

The current implementation in components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjs appears to be a basic skeleton. Before this app can be considered production-ready, please address the following:

• Remove Debug Logging:
  The authKeys() method currently uses console.log to output keys from this.$auth. This can expose sensitive data and clutter production logs.

• Implement Error Handling:
  There is no error handling. Wrap access to this.$auth in a try–catch block to safely manage exceptions.

• Improve Documentation & API Design:
  Add appropriate documentation to explain the purpose of the Currents API app. Include function-level JSDoc comments, and leave clear placeholders for the actual API methods required.

• Clarify PR Scope:
  It's unclear how this new skeleton app supports the PR's objective of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. Please confirm if this inclusion is intentional or if further work is pending.

Below is a suggested refactor:

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "currents_api",
   propDefinitions: {},
+  /**
+   * @description Currents API app: Provides API integration for [explain functionality/purpose]
+   */
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    /**
+     * @description Retrieve the authentication keys from the connected account.
+     * @returns {string[]} Array of authentication keys or an empty array if an error occurs.
+     */
+    authKeys() {
+      try {
+        return Object.keys(this.$auth);
+      } catch (error) {
+        console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error);
+        return [];
+      }
+    },
+    // TODO: Implement additional API methods required for Currents API functionality.
   },
 };

Please address these points to ensure the app meets production standards.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
FILE="components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjs"
if [ -f "$FILE" ]; then
  echo "File '$FILE' found. Showing first 20 lines:"
  head -n 20 "$FILE"

  echo ""
  echo "Occurrences of 'console.log' in '$FILE':"
  grep -n "console.log" "$FILE" || echo "No console.log found"
else
  echo "File not found: $FILE"
fi

Length of output: 991

---

Currents API App: Refactor for Production Safety and Clarity

The current implementation in components/currents_api/currents_api.app.mjs is a skeleton that isn't ready for production. In particular:

• Remove Debug Logging: The authKeys() method logs the connected account's keys using console.log, which may expose sensitive information.
• Implement Error Handling: There is no error management around accessing this.$auth. A try–catch block should be added.
• Improve Documentation and API Definition: Enhance inline documentation with JSDoc comments and provide placeholders for actual API methods.
• Clarify PR Scope: It remains unclear how this Currents API integration ties into the overall objective related to migrating Shopify to the updated GraphQL API.

Below is a suggested refactoring:

 export default {
   type: "app",
   app: "currents_api",
   propDefinitions: {},
+  /**
+   * @description Currents API app: Provides integration for [describe purpose and functionality].
+   */
   methods: {
-    // this.$auth contains connected account data
-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    /**
+     * @description Retrieve the authentication keys from the connected account.
+     * @returns {string[]} Array of keys or an empty array if an error occurs.
+     */
+    authKeys() {
+      try {
+        return Object.keys(this.$auth);
+      } catch (error) {
+        console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error);
+        return [];
+      }
+    },
+    // TODO: Implement actual API methods for the Currents API.
   },
 };

Please address these issues to ensure the app is robust and production-ready.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "currents_api",
  propDefinitions: {},
  /**
   * @description Currents API app: Provides integration for [describe purpose and functionality].
   */
  methods: {
    /**
     * @description Retrieve the authentication keys from the connected account.
     * @returns {string[]} Array of keys or an empty array if an error occurs.
     */
    authKeys() {
      try {
        return Object.keys(this.$auth);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error("Error retrieving auth keys:", error);
        return [];
      }
    },
    // TODO: Implement actual API methods for the Currents API.
  },
};

components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (1)

241-246: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Document metafield type options more explicitly

The metafields property description includes examples, but doesn't fully document the available types for the type field. Consider enhancing the documentation to list all supported metafield types.

---

🌐 Web query:

What are all the supported metafield types in Shopify API?

💡 Result:

Shopify's API supports a comprehensive range of metafield types to handle diverse data requirements. These types are categorized into several groups, each serving specific use cases:

Basic Data Types

• Text: single_line_text_field, multi_line_text_field
• Numbers: number_integer, number_decimal
• Boolean: true_or_false (checkbox)
• Date/Time: date, date_time
• Special Formats:
  • color (RGB hex values)
  • rating (decimal values on a scale)
  • url (HTTP/HTTPS/mailto/sms/tel links)
  • link (anchor text + URL pairs, added in 2024)[5][12]

Measurement Types

• dimension (length)
• volume
• weight
• All support metric/imperial units[6][12]

Reference Types

• product
• variant
• collection
• page
• file
• customer
• company
• metaobject (custom objects)[6][12][13]

Complex Data Types

• json (arbitrary JSON data)
• money (numeric amount with currency)
• id (unique identifiers)[12][13]

List Types

Created by adding list. prefix to base types:

• list.product_reference
• list.single_line_text_field
• list.color
• list.link (added in 2024)
• Supported for most types except boolean and money[2][5][12]

Validation-Enhanced Types

• Unique Values: Enforced for single_line_text_field, url, and number_integer types[10]
• Domain-Restricted URLs: Configurable via metafield definitions[6]

For example, a list.product_reference metafield could store complementary products, while a rating type might display star ratings validated through a 5-point scale[6][8]. Developers should use link instead of basic URL types when needing both text and URL storage[5][12].

These types enable powerful customization, from displaying ingredient lists via list.single_line_text_field to creating smart collections using boolean flags[2][10]. List types particularly enhance filtering capabilities, allowing products to appear in multiple categories simultaneously[2][11].

Citations:

• 1: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields
• 2: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields/metafield-definitions/metafield-lists
• 3: https://docs.celigo.com/hc/en-us/articles/4413333355547-Manage-and-configure-metafield-definitions-for-Shopify-products-and-its-variants
• 4: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields/metafield-definitions/creating-custom-metafield-definitions
• 5: https://shopify.dev/changelog/new-metafield-definition-types-link-and-list-link
• 6: https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/custom-data/metafields/metafield-definitions/metafield-types
• 7: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data
• 8: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data/metafields/list-of-standard-definitions
• 9: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/storefront/2022-07/objects/metafield
• 10: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data/metafields/use-metafield-capabilities
• 11: https://gadget.dev/blog/new-metafield-types-and-shopify-api-resources-now-available
• 12: https://shopify.dev/docs/apps/build/custom-data/metafields/list-of-data-types
• 13: https://shopify.dev/docs/api/functions/reference/product-discounts/graphql/common-objects/metafield

---

Enhance Shopify Metafield Documentation

• In components/shopify/shopify.app.mjs (lines 241-246), the current metafields property description provides examples but does not comprehensively list the supported metafield types.
• Based on Shopify's documentation, please update the description to explicitly include all supported types. For example, you might list:
  • Basic Data Types: single_line_text_field, multi_line_text_field, number_integer, number_decimal, true_or_false, date, date_time, color, rating, url, and link.
  • Measurement Types: dimension, volume, weight (with support for metric/imperial units).
  • Reference Types: product, variant, collection, page, file, customer, company, metaobject.
  • Complex Data Types: json, money, id.
  • List Types: Prefixed with list. (such as list.product_reference, list.single_line_text_field, list.color, list.link, etc.).
• Adding these details (with an appropriate reference to Shopify’s official documentation, e.g., Shopify Metafield Data Types) will provide developers with a clear and complete overview.

components/govee/actions/retrieve-device-info/retrieve-device-info.mjs (1)

34-46: ⚠️ Potential issue

Prevent potential runtime error when device is not found.
If no device matches the provided deviceId, accessing device.sku will throw an error. Consider adding a guard clause to handle this case:

+ if (!device) {
+   throw new Error(`No device found for deviceId: ${deviceId}`);
+ }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices();
    const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
    if (!device) {
      throw new Error(`No device found for deviceId: ${deviceId}`);
    }

    const response = await getDeviceStatus({
      $,
      data: {
        requestId: uuid(),
        payload: {
          sku: device.sku,
          device: deviceId,
        },
      },
    });

components/govee/actions/control-device/control-device.mjs (2)

141-153: ⚠️ Potential issue

Guard against an undefined device object before constructing the request.
If devices.find(...) returns undefined, referencing device.sku will cause a runtime error. Add a guard clause:

+ if (!device) {
+   throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`);
+ }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  async run({ $ }) {
    const {
      app,
      controlDevice,
      deviceId,
      commandType,
      value,
      ...fields
    } = this;

    const { data: devices } = await app.listDevices();
    const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
    if (!device) {
      throw new Error(`Device with ID ${deviceId} not found`);
    }

---

29-39: ⚠️ Potential issue

Handle missing or invalid capability parameters gracefully.
If capability is undefined, then parameters becomes undefined, causing a runtime error at if (parameters.dataType === "ENUM"). Add a check to avoid referencing parameters when it’s undefined:

const { parameters } = capability ?? {};
+ if (!parameters || !parameters.dataType) {
+   return {};
+ }

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  async additionalProps() {
    const {
      deviceId,
      commandType,
    } = this;

    const { data: devices } = await this.app.listDevices();
    const device = devices.find(({ device }) => device === deviceId);
    const capability = device?.capabilities?.find(({ type }) => type === commandType);
    const { parameters } = capability ?? {};
    if (!parameters || !parameters.dataType) {
      return {};
    }
    // existing code continues...
  }

components/kindo/kindo.app.mjs (1)

17-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling to makeRequest method

The current implementation doesn't include any explicit error handling for failed requests. Consider adding try/catch with appropriate error messages.

    makeRequest({
      $ = this, path, headers, ...args
    } = {}) {
+     try {
        return axios($, {
          ...args,
          url: this.getUrl(path),
          headers: this.getHeaders(headers),
        });
+     } catch (error) {
+       const status = error.response?.status;
+       const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message;
+       throw new Error(`Kindo API request failed with ${status}: ${message}`);
+     }
    },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    makeRequest({
      $ = this, path, headers, ...args
    } = {}) {
      try {
        return axios($, {
          ...args,
          url: this.getUrl(path),
          headers: this.getHeaders(headers),
        });
      } catch (error) {
        const status = error.response?.status;
        const message = error.response?.data?.message || error.message;
        throw new Error(`Kindo API request failed with ${status}: ${message}`);
      }
    },

components/kindo/actions/chat/chat.mjs (3)

79-119: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling in run method

The run method doesn't include error handling for API call failures. Add a try/catch block to provide better error messages to users.

  async run({ $ }) {
    const {
      chat,
      model,
      messages,
      maxTokens,
      temperature,
      topP,
      n,
      stop,
      presencePenalty,
      frequencyPenalty,
      additionalParameters,
    } = this;

+    try {
      const response = await chat({
        $,
        data: {
          model,
          messages: utils.parseArray(messages),
          max_tokens: maxTokens,
          ...(temperature && {
            temperature: +temperature,
          }),
          ...(topP && {
            top_p: +topP,
          }),
          n,
          stop,
          ...(presencePenalty && {
            presence_penalty: +presencePenalty,
          }),
          ...(frequencyPenalty && {
            frequency_penalty: +frequencyPenalty,
          }),
          ...additionalParameters,
        },
      });
      $.export("$summary", "Successfully created model response");
      return response;
+    } catch (error) {
+      $.export("$summary", `Failed to create model response: ${error.message}`);
+      throw error;
+    }
  },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  async run({ $ }) {
    const {
      chat,
      model,
      messages,
      maxTokens,
      temperature,
      topP,
      n,
      stop,
      presencePenalty,
      frequencyPenalty,
      additionalParameters,
    } = this;

    try {
      const response = await chat({
        $,
        data: {
          model,
          messages: utils.parseArray(messages),
          max_tokens: maxTokens,
          ...(temperature && {
            temperature: +temperature,
          }),
          ...(topP && {
            top_p: +topP,
          }),
          n,
          stop,
          ...(presencePenalty && {
            presence_penalty: +presencePenalty,
          }),
          ...(frequencyPenalty && {
            frequency_penalty: +frequencyPenalty,
          }),
          ...additionalParameters,
        },
      });
      $.export("$summary", "Successfully created model response");
      return response;
    } catch (error) {
      $.export("$summary", `Failed to create model response: ${error.message}`);
      throw error;
    }
  },

---

20-21: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix documentation reference in messages description

The description appears to reference OpenAI's documentation rather than Kindo-specific documentation, which may confuse users. Update this to reference Kindo's documentation.

    messages: {
      type: "string[]",
      label: "Messages",
-      description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Depending on the [model](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) you use, different message types (modalities) are supported, like [text](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-generation), [images](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/vision), and [audio](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/audio). [See the documentation](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-messages) for more information. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]",
+      description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Each message should be an object with 'role' and 'content' properties. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`. [See the Kindo documentation](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) for more information.",
    },

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    messages: {
      type: "string[]",
      label: "Messages",
      description: "A list of messages comprising the conversation so far. Each message should be an object with 'role' and 'content' properties. Eg. `[{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Hello, world!\"}]`. [See the Kindo documentation](https://app.kindo.ai/settings/api) for more information.",
    },

---

28-63: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Convert string parameters to numeric props with validation

Several numeric parameters are defined as strings but converted to numbers with the + operator. It's better to define them as numeric types with appropriate validation.

For parameters like temperature, topP, presencePenalty, and frequencyPenalty, consider:

    temperature: {
-      type: "string",
+      type: "number",
      label: "Temperature",
      description: "**Optional**. What [sampling temperature](https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-sample-from-language-models-682bceb97277) to use. Higher values means the model will take more risks. Try `0.9` for more creative applications, and `0` (argmax sampling) for ones with a well-defined answer.",
      optional: true,
+      min: 0,
+      max: 2,
    },
    topP: {
-      type: "string",
+      type: "number",
      label: "Top P",
      description: "An alternative to sampling with temperature, called nucleus sampling, where the model considers the results of the tokens with top_p probability mass. So `0.1` means only the tokens comprising the top 10% probability mass are considered. We generally recommend altering this or `temperature` but not both.",
      optional: true,
+      min: 0,
+      max: 1,
    },

And then update the run method:

    ...(temperature && {
-      temperature: +temperature,
+      temperature: temperature,
    }),
    ...(topP && {
-      top_p: +topP,
+      top_p: topP,
    }),

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    temperature: {
-      type: "string",
+      type: "number",
      label: "Temperature",
      description: "**Optional**. What [sampling temperature](https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-sample-from-language-models-682bceb97277) to use. Higher values means the model will take more risks. Try `0.9` for more creative applications, and `0` (argmax sampling) for ones with a well-defined answer.",
      optional: true,
+      min: 0,
+      max: 2,
    },
    topP: {
-      type: "string",
+      type: "number",
      label: "Top P",
      description: "An alternative to sampling with temperature, called nucleus sampling, where the model considers the results of the tokens with top_p probability mass. So `0.1` means only the tokens comprising the top 10% probability mass are considered. We generally recommend altering this or `temperature` but not both.",
      optional: true,
+      min: 0,
+      max: 1,
    },
    n: {
      type: "integer",
      label: "N",
      description: "How many completions to generate for each prompt",
      optional: true,
    },
    stop: {
      type: "string[]",
      label: "Stop",
      description: "Up to 4 sequences where the API will stop generating further tokens. The returned text will not contain the stop sequence.",
      optional: true,
    },
    presencePenalty: {
      type: "string",
      label: "Presence Penalty",
      description: "Number between `-2.0` and `2.0`. Positive values penalize new tokens based on whether they appear in the text so far, increasing the model's likelihood to talk about new topics.",
      optional: true,
    },
    frequencyPenalty: {
      type: "string",
      label: "Frequency Penalty",
      description: "Number between `-2.0` and `2.0`. Positive values penalize new tokens based on their existing frequency in the text so far, decreasing the model's likelihood to repeat the same line verbatim.",
      optional: true,
    },

// Later in the run method update:

    ...(temperature && {
-      temperature: +temperature,
+      temperature: temperature,
    }),
    ...(topP && {
-      top_p: +topP,
+      top_p: topP,
    }),

components/docker_engine/docker_engine.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

Clarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR

This new Docker Engine app file seems unrelated to the PR's stated purpose of migrating Shopify components to the updated GraphQL API. While the file itself has an appropriate structure for a basic app module, its inclusion in this PR needs explanation.

The authKeys() method appears to be for debugging purposes only and outputs sensitive authentication information to console logs, which should not be left in production code.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual implementation methods for Docker Engine API integration

---

Action: Clarify file purpose and remove sensitive debug logging

• The new Docker Engine app file (components/docker_engine/docker_engine.app.mjs) appears unrelated to the stated Shopify migration work. Please provide context in the PR description explaining why this file is part of the changes.
• The authKeys() method is used solely for debugging by logging authentication keys (this.$auth), which risks exposing sensitive data in production. This method should be removed or replaced with a proper implementation for Docker Engine API integration.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual implementation methods for Docker Engine API integration

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "docker_engine",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // this.$auth contains connected account data
    // Add actual implementation methods for Docker Engine API integration
  },
};

components/housecall_pro/housecall_pro.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Clarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR

This new Housecall Pro app file appears to be unrelated to the PR's stated goal of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. The file follows the same template as the other new app files in this PR.

The authKeys() method is writing potentially sensitive authentication information to console logs, which is not recommended for production code.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual implementation methods for Housecall Pro API integration

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "housecall_pro",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // this.$auth contains connected account data
    // Add actual implementation methods for Housecall Pro API integration
  },
};

components/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app/microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Clarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR

This Microsoft Graph API app file seems unrelated to the stated purpose of migrating Shopify to an updated GraphQL API. The file follows the same template pattern as the other app files added in this PR.

The authKeys() method logs authentication data to the console, which could expose sensitive information and should not be included in production code.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual implementation methods for Microsoft Graph API integration

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "microsoft_graph_api_daemon_app",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // this.$auth contains connected account data
    // Add actual implementation methods for Microsoft Graph API integration
  },
};

components/minerstat/minerstat.app.mjs (1)

1-11: 💡 Verification agent

❓ Verification inconclusive

Clarify purpose of new app file in Shopify migration PR

This new Minerstat app file, like the others in this PR, seems unrelated to migrating Shopify components to an updated GraphQL API. The file contains only a basic app structure with a debugging method.

The authKeys() method outputs authentication information to the console, which is not appropriate for production code as it may expose sensitive data.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Add actual implementation methods for Minerstat API integration

Additionally, please clarify why these new app files are included in a PR focused on Shopify API migration. If they're intended for a different purpose, consider separating them into their own PR for clarity.

---

Critical Action Required: Refactor Minerstat App File and Clarify Its Role

• The file components/minerstat/minerstat.app.mjs currently includes only a basic app structure with a debugging method (authKeys()) that logs authentication keys to the console. This could inadvertently expose sensitive data in production.
• The file appears unrelated to the Shopify API migration focus of this PR. Please clarify the intended use of these new Minerstat-related files.
• Recommended changes:
  • Security: Remove the console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth)); call or replace it with proper logic that does not expose sensitive authentication details.
  • Purpose Clarification: If this file is meant to integrate with the Minerstat API, implement the appropriate methods; otherwise, consider moving it to a separate PR to keep concerns isolated.

-    authKeys() {
-      console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
-    },
+    // Remove debugging calls and implement proper Minerstat API integration methods

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

export default {
  type: "app",
  app: "minerstat",
  propDefinitions: {},
  methods: {
    // Remove debugging calls and implement proper Minerstat API integration methods
  },
};

components/microsoft_dataverse/microsoft_dataverse.app.mjs (2)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add API interaction methods to this app component

This appears to be a skeleton implementation that lacks methods for interacting with the Microsoft Dataverse API. For a complete and usable app component, consider adding methods that will be needed by actions and sources using this integration.

Consider adding methods like:

• Data retrieval methods
• CRUD operations
• Authentication handling beyond just logging keys

This will make the component more useful for building actions and sources.

---

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove console.log statement from production code

The authKeys() method currently logs authentication keys to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that shouldn't be included in production code.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

If this method is needed for documentation or debugging purposes, consider adding a comment indicating it's for development use only, or implement a safer alternative that doesn't log sensitive information.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/greenhouse_job_board_api/greenhouse_job_board_api.app.mjs (2)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add API interaction methods to this app component

This appears to be a skeleton implementation that lacks methods for interacting with the Greenhouse Job Board API. For a complete and usable app component, consider adding methods that will be needed by actions and sources using this integration.

Consider adding methods like:

• Job listing retrieval
• Application processing
• Candidate management methods
• Authentication handling beyond just logging keys

This will make the component more useful for building actions and sources.

---

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove console.log statement from production code

The authKeys() method logs authentication keys to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that shouldn't be included in production code.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

If this method is needed for documentation or debugging purposes, consider adding a comment indicating it's for development use only, or implement a safer alternative that doesn't log sensitive information.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/cloudflare_browser_rendering/cloudflare_browser_rendering.app.mjs (2)

1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add API interaction methods to this app component

This appears to be a skeleton implementation that lacks methods for interacting with the Cloudflare Browser Rendering API. For a complete and usable app component, consider adding methods that will be needed by actions and sources using this integration.

Consider adding methods like:

• Browser rendering configuration methods
• Screenshot or DOM interaction methods
• Request and response handling methods
• Authentication handling beyond just logging keys

This will make the component more useful for building actions and sources.

---

7-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove console.log statement from production code

The authKeys() method logs authentication keys to the console, which could potentially expose sensitive information in logs. This appears to be a debugging function that shouldn't be included in production code.

- authKeys() {
-   console.log(Object.keys(this.$auth));
- },

If this method is needed for documentation or debugging purposes, consider adding a comment indicating it's for development use only, or implement a safer alternative that doesn't log sensitive information.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

components/elastic_email/actions/unsubscribe-contact/unsubscribe-contact.mjs (1)

19-26: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify that parsedEmails will always have a length property.

The code assumes parsedEmails has a length property on line 25, but depending on what parseObject returns, this might not always be the case. Consider adding a check to ensure parsedEmails is an array before accessing its length.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Locate the parseObject implementation to understand its behavior
echo "Searching for parseObject implementation..."
cat components/elastic_email/common/utils.mjs

Length of output: 589

---

Ensure parsedEmails Is an Array Before Accessing Its length Property

After reviewing the implementation of parseObject, it’s clear that if this.unsubscribeEmails is falsy or not an array, parseObject may return undefined or a value without a length property. This can lead to runtime errors when accessing parsedEmails.length. For example:

• A falsy this.unsubscribeEmails results in undefined.
• A non-array, non-string value is returned as-is and might not have a length property.

To avoid potential errors, please add a type check or a default value. One possible solution is:

const emails = Array.isArray(parsedEmails) ? parsedEmails : [];
$.export("$summary", `Unsubscribed ${emails.length} contact(s) successfully`);

components/elastic_email/actions/send-email/send-email.mjs (1)

106-108: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve validation for recipients data

The current implementation uses optional chaining with parseObject(this.recipients)?.map() which could result in a runtime error if the parsing fails or returns null/undefined.

Add proper validation to ensure recipients are properly formatted:

-        Recipients: parseObject(this.recipients)?.map((item) => ({
+        Recipients: (parseObject(this.recipients) || this.recipients).map((item) => ({
           Email: item,
         })),

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

        Recipients: (parseObject(this.recipients) || this.recipients).map((item) => ({
          Email: item,
        })),